EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dosios, T.
Right arrow Articles by Angouras, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dosios, T.
Right arrow Articles by Angouras, D.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 10, 1052-1056, Copyright © 1996 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Follow-up of patients after resection for bronchogenic carcinoma

T Dosios and D Angouras
2nd Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Greece.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the members of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) follow up their patients after pulmonary resection for bronchogenic carcinoma. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 317 EACTS members (thoracic and cardiothoracic surgeons as well as surgeons of unknown field of clinical practice). We eventually received completed questionnaires from 101 (31.9%) surgeons, who were classified into "thoracic" and "others". Their answers were analysed by the chi-square test. RESULTS: One out of four EACTS members does not follow up his/her patients, while the remainder follow them up with or without the collaboration of a clinical oncologist, a pneumonologist or a family physician. Among the surgeons who follow up their patients, only one out of two does so throughout the patient's remaining life. The frequency of the routine follow-up visits as well as the type and frequency of the examinations used vary significantly among the members of the Association, but generally the frequency of visits tends to decrease with time. Although 89.8% of surgeons believe that a well scheduled follow-up is beneficial to the patient, only 67% think that such a follow-up is cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: A great diversity was observed in the way patients operated on for lung cancer are followed up by the EACTS members. The differences were more evident between "thoracic" and "other" surgeons. However, hard data showing the effect of these differences on patients' long-term survival are not available and prospective cooperative studies on this subject are required. Taking into account that these patients are, for the rest of their lives, at high risk of development of a metachronous primary bronchogenic carcinoma or other potentially curable malignancies, we believe that a life-long follow-up is mandatory.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.