|
|
||||||||
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 10, 201-206, Copyright © 1996 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
JR Gonzalez-Juanatey, JM Garcia-Acuna, M Vega Fernandez, A Amaro Cendon, V Castelo Fuentes, JB Garcia-Bengoechea and M Gil de la Pena
The hemodynamics of five designs of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve
bioprostheses were examined in 47 resting patients by Doppler
echocardiography. The salient differences among the five designs are that
valve leaflets are mounted inside the support frame in one (the
Carpentier-Edwards valve, evaluated in 4 patients) and outside the frame in
the other four (the Ionescu-Shiley (16 patients), Mitroflow (4), Bioflo (8)
and Labcor-Santiago (15)); and that two models have either total (Bioflo)
or partial (Labcor-Santiago) protective pericardial sheaths on the stent,
while the other three do not. The hemodynamic parameters determined
included transvalvular pressure drop, valve area, left ventricular outflow
tract diameter, subvalvular/valvular velocity ratio and
subvalvular/valvular velocity- time integral ratio. There were no
significant differences among the various valves as regards left
ventricular outflow tract diameter, subvalvular/valvular velocity ratio or
subvalvular/valvular velocity- time integral ratio. Negative correlation
between left ventricular outflow tract diameter and subvalvular velocity (r
= -0.66, P < 0.001) confirmed the need to correct for prevalvular
velocities when using the Bernouilli equation to calculate the pressure
drop across small pericardial aortic valve bioprostheses. The Bioflo design
caused significantly greater pressure drops (peak 38.3 +/- 8.3 mmHg, mean
24.6 +/- 4.8 mmHg) and smaller areas (0.82 +/- 0.17 cm2) than the Ionescu-
Shiley (20.3 +/- 5.6 and 11.7 +/- 3.8 mmHg, 1.19 +/- 5.3 and 10.1 +/- 3.1
mmHg, 1.27 +/- 0.12 cm2) valves.
ARTICLES
Hemodynamics of various designs of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve bioprosthesis
Department of Cardiology, Galician General Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rao, G. T. Christakis, J. Sever, S. E. Fremes, G. Bhatnagar, G. Cohen, M. A. Borger, L. Abouzahr, and B. S. Goldman A NOVEL COMPARISON OF STENTLESS VERSUS STENTED VALVES IN THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1999; 117(3): 431 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1122 - 1123. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |