|
|
||||||||
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 32-37, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
CA Jacobi, HU Zieren, JM Muller and H Pichlmaier
OBJECTIVE: The effects of the different surgical approaches (transhiatal
esophagectomy and right-sided transthoracic esophagectomy) on perioperative
cardiopulmonary function in the surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma
are discussed controversially and have not yet been evaluated. METHODS: In
a prospective randomized study including 32 patients, we investigated the
effects of the surgical approach (blunt dissection (n = 16) versus
transthoracic en-bloc resection (EB) (n = 16)) in the treatment of
esophagus carcinoma on perioperative cardiopulmonary function. The
following parameters were measured in all patients: cardiac index (CI),
mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary
artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP),
intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT), arterio- alveolar (aaDO2), arterio-venous
oxygen pressure difference (avDO2), and blood gas analyses. Time of
measurement were: after induction of anesthesia, beginning and end of
esophagus resection, end of surgery, 1 h postoperatively, and then every 12
h until the third postoperative day. RESULTS: Compared to blunt dissection,
en-bloc esophagectomy was found to be associated with a transient
deterioration of pulmonary function during one-lung ventilation in the
left-lateral position, which could already be compensated for during the
intervention. No other significant differences in cardiopulmonary effects
were seen between the two surgical techniques. The incidence of
postoperative complications was identical in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The
results of our study show that en-bloc resection is only associated with an
increased intraoperative pulmonary strain that is completely compensated
during the operation and that there is no difference in cardiopulmonary
functions between the two techniques in the postoperative course.
ARTICLES
Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma: the influence of surgical approach and esophageal resection on cardiopulmonary function
Department of Surgery, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Germany.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-G. Goan, H.-C. Chang, H.-K. Hsu, and Y.-P. Chou An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 536 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B.F. Hulscher, J. W. van Sandick, A. G.E.M. de Boer, B. P.L. Wijnhoven, J. G.P. Tijssen, P. Fockens, P. F.M. Stalmeier, F. J.W. ten Kate, H. van Dekken, H. Obertop, et al. Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus N. Engl. J. Med., November 21, 2002; 347(21): 1662 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B.F. Hulscher, J. G.P. Tijssen, H. Obertop, and J. J. B. van Lanschot Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 306 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Koster, M. Loebe, R. Hansen, E. V. Potapov, G. P. Noon, H. Kuppe, and R. Hetzer Alterations in coagulation after implantation of a pulsatile Novacor LVAD and the axial flow micromed DeBakey LVAD Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 533 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |