EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goffin, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goffin, Y.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 676-681, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Are pulmonary homografts subjected to pulmonary hypertension more appropriate for aortic valve replacement than normal pulmonary homografts? Results of echocardiography in a multicentric study

M Gaudino, T Van Geldorp, W Daenen, P Kalmar and Y Goffin
European Homograft Bank, Brussels, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the function in aortic position of cryopreserved pulmonary homografts subjected to pulmonary hypertension with that of normal cryopreserved pulmonary homografts. METHODS: Pulmonary valves (52) were implanted in aortic position in different cardiothoracic centres. The valves were classified as follows: Group I-pulmonary hypertension (procured from recipients of heart/heart-lung transplantation, 31 valves), Group II-normal pulmonary pressure (procured from cadavers and multiorgan donors, 21 valves). Regular echocardiographic follow-up was obtained by the implanting centers. Significant echo changes were defined as insufficiency > 2+ and/or stenosis producing a delta P > 30 mm Hg. RESULTS: Pulmonary homografts showed the following significant echo changes: in the Pulmonary Hypertension Group, 7, 27 and 33% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively; in the normal PA Group 10, 37.5 and 80% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. In both groups the most common echocardiographic alteration was homograft insufficiency rather than stenosis. Thus, pulmonary homografts subjected to long-term pulmonary hypertension have significantly less echo changes than normal pulmonary homografts, especially after 12 months (chi 2: P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pulmonary valves subjected to pulmonary hypertension might be more appropriate than normal pulmonary homograft for aortic valve replacement, constituting a possible alternative in case of lack of aortic valve homografts. However, the failure of two out of five valves in the longer term must dictate caution while waiting further long-term results.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.