Clinical results with single lead VDD pacing

HOME

HELP

QUICK SEARCH:

	Author:		Keyword(s):
Year:		Vol:		Page:

This Article

	Full Text (PDF)
	Alert me when this article is cited
	Alert me if a correction is posted

Services

	Email this article to a friend
	Similar articles in this journal
	Similar articles in PubMed
	Alert me to new issues of the journal
	Add to Personal Folders
	Download to citation manager
	Permission Requests

Citing Articles

	Citing Articles via Google Scholar

Google Scholar

	Articles by Liebold, A.
	Articles by Birnbaum, D. E.
	Search for Related Content

PubMed

	PubMed Citation
	Articles by Liebold, A.
	Articles by Birnbaum, D. E.

ARTICLES

Clinical results with single lead VDD pacing

A Liebold, J Merk, C Keyl, H Aebert and DE Birnbaum
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Universitat Regensburg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with atrioventricular block single lead atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (VDD) may have advantages compared to conventional dual chamber pacing (DDD) since it eliminates the need for an atrial lead. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of a novel VDD pacemaker and the reliability of atrial sensing via the "floating' atrial electrode. METHODS: 31 patients (10 females; age 64 +/- 13 years) underwent an implantation of a VDD pacemaker system (Intermedics UNITY). The patients were analyzed with regard to implantation parameters, complications and postoperative atrial sensing performance using the diagnostic data of the pacemaker memory. The mean follow-up was 6.3 (1-18) months. RESULTS: The implantation procedure did not differ from that of conventional single chamber pacemakers. Dislocation of a ventricular electrode was the only complication observed. The P wave at implantation was 1.6 +/- 0.9 mV and dropped to 0.9 +/- 0.4 mV at predischarge. During follow-up the atrial sensing threshold remained stable. The atrial sensing performance (percentage of atrial synchronous ventricular complexes) after reprogramming the highest atrial sensitivity was 99.7%. Two patients (6%) developed atrial fibrillation. 29 patients (94%) remained in VDD mode as primarily intended. CONCLUSIONS: From these results it is concluded that VDD pacing represents an excellent alternative in patients with atrioventricular block and intact sinus node function. The atrial sensing was found to be reliable.