HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Katayama, O. Articles by Yacoub, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Katayama, O. Articles by Yacoub, M. H.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 751-762, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Effect of cardioplegia infusion pressure on coronary artery endothelium and cardiac mechanical function

O Katayama, M Amrani, S Ledingham, J Jayakumar, RT Smolenski, N Severs, S Rothery and MH Yacoub
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex, UK.

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of cardioplegia infusion pressure may be important, particularly in immature hearts and in hearts without coronary artery disease. We have investigated the effects of infusion pressure on the preservation of the isolated rat heart. METHODS: Hearts (five in each group) were subjected to a single (20 ml) infusion of St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution at pressures of 60, 120, 180 and 240 cmH2O (44-176 mmHg), followed by 30 min of hypothermic (20 degrees C) ischemia. RESULTS: Mean recovery of cardiac output (expressed as a percentage of its preischemic value) decreased with increasing infusion pressure: 96.1 +/- 0.6%, 87.3 +/- 2.1% (P < 0.05 vs. 60 cmH2O), 79.3 +/- 2.8% (P < 0.05 vs. 120 cmH2O), 72.0 +/- 3.0% (not significant vs. 180 cmH2O), respectively. Endothelial function, as assessed by pre- and post-ischemic ability to secrete NO in response to 5-hydroxytryptamine, remained relatively normal after infusion at 60 cmH2O, but changed from vasodilation to vasoconstriction after infusion at 240 cmH2O. Electron microscopy revealed mild endothelial damage after infusion at 240 cmH2O, which was greatly exacerbated by reperfusion and was accompanied by regions of myocyte damage compatible with reperfusion of unprotected myocardium. The relationship between cardioplegia infusion pressure and infusion time was not linear and implied that infusion pressures greater than 120 cmH2O caused vascular smooth muscle constriction. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that even mildly raised cardioplegia infusion pressures may be detrimental to cardiac preservation and the effects are possibly mediated through endothelial damage and pressure- induced coronary vasoconstriction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Yang and G.-W. He Effect of Cardioplegic and Organ Preservation Solutions and Their Components on Coronary Endothelium-Derived Relaxing Factors Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 757 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Parolari, P. Rubini, A. Cannata, L. Bonati, F. Alamanni, E. Tremoli, and P. Biglioli Endothelial damage during myocardial preservation and storage Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 682 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]