HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kreitmann, B. Articles by Metras, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kreitmann, B. Articles by Metras, D.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 11, 943-952, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Growth potential of aortic autografts and allografts: effects of cryopreservation and immunosuppression in an experimental model

B Kreitmann, A Riberi, M Zeranska, G Novakovitch and D Metras
Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Children's Hospital, Marseille, France.

OBJECTIVE: An animal model has been used to evaluate the potential of growth of vascular autografts and allografts, and the effects of cryopreservation, rejection and immunosuppression on this growth. METHODS: In 35 animals (seven groups of five female NZW rabbits; age 5- 6 weeks; weight 1.1 kg), a graft interposition was performed at the level of the infrarenal aorta. Different groups included fresh autografts, fresh and cryopreserved consanguineous allografts (donor: litter sister), fresh and cryopreserved immunosuppressed (IS) consanguineous allografts (receiving cyclosporin 10 mg/kg per day) and fresh and cryopreserved allografts. Animals were allowed to grow normally and were sacrificed at the mean weight of 2.89 kg. We studied the growth of the native aorta and of the graft and calculated the growth ratio (growth of the graft/growth of native vessel). Grafts and adjacent aorta were histologically studied. RESULTS: Growth of the graft was normal (mean ratio 1.08; S.D. = 0.21) for autografts, and for fresh and cryopreserved IS consanguineous grafts. Growth was absent (mean ratio 0.12; S.D. = 0.15) for fresh and cryopreserved allografts (P = 0.0001). In consanguineous grafts without IS, growth was absent or normal, presumably according to genetic compatibility, but never intermediate. Histological study showed normal optic microscopic aspects when growth was normal and, when growth was absent, aspects compatible with rejection including mainly intimal hyperplasia and medial thinning. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Normal growth of arterial autografts was confirmed; (2) cryopreservation did not prevent potential growth of an arterial graft; and (3) in an allogenic situation, without IS, an aortic graft, fresh or cryopreserved, never showed any growth potential.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Feier, F. Collart, O. Ghez, A. Riberi, T. Caus, B. Kreitmann, and D. Metras Risk Factors, Dynamics, and Cutoff Values for Homograft Stenosis After the Ross Procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1669 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Jashari, B. Van Hoeck, M. Gaudino, W. Daenen, T. Van Geldorp, P. Kalmar, and Y. Goffin Are pulmonary homografts which were subjected to pulmonary hypertension more appropriate for aortic valve replacement than normal pulmonary homografts? A long-term multicentric echography study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 140 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]