EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Malek G. Massad
Patrick M. McCarthy
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Massad, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Massad, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, P. M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:S11-S17
© 1997 Elsevier Science NL

Will permanent LVADs be better than heart transplantation?

Malek G. Massad * , Patrick M. McCarthy

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Current interest in permanent mechanical support systems has been renewed as a result of the present shortage of human heart donors, and in view of the satisfactory results obtained with their use as a bridge-to-transplant. As the number of donors is unlikely to increase dramatically in the near future, there is an urgent need to develop mechanical alternatives to transplantation. Preliminary data on the use of the implantable electric LVAD as a bridge-to-transplant indicate that the adverse clinical and mechanical events in outpatients are few and do not preclude use of the device on a permanent basis. Except for infections, transplant issues relating to need for endomyocardial biopsies, rejection, malignancies, and graft arteriosclerosis do not apply to LVAD recipients who face important issues relating to device durability, cost, and potential need for concomitant right heart support. This lack of data on long-term durability contrasts with a yearly mortality rate of about 5% after the first year of transplant. With the initiation of clinical trials on the permanent use of the electric LVAD, several design modifications and upgrading of the currently available devices are expected. Completely sealed systems with steadily improving durability will hopefully appear. Inductive coupling techniques under investigation and development appear to be able to transmit energy without damage across the skin. It is anticipated that with more reliable electronic microprocessors, the future generation of implantable LVADs will be smaller, more reliable and longer lasting.

Key Words: Permanent LUADS • Heart transplantation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M. Loebe, T. Drews, E. Potapov, D.-V. Ngo, R. zu Dohna, and R. Hetzer
Device selection in mechanical circulatory support
Perfusion, July 1, 2000; 15(4): 313 - 318.
[PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
T. Drews, M. Loebe, E. Hennig, F. Kaufmann, J. Muller, and R. Hetzer
The 'Berlin Heart' assist device
Perfusion, July 1, 2000; 15(4): 387 - 396.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.