HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rizzoli, G. Articles by Tiso, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rizzoli, G. Articles by Tiso, E.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 12, 202-208, Copyright © 1997 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Aortic dissection type A versus type B: a different post-surgical death hazard?

G Rizzoli, D Scalia, D Casarotto and E Tiso
Istituto Chirurgia Cardiocascolare, University of Padova, Italy.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type B aortic dissection differ from patients with type A dissection in age, hypertension prevalence, indications and timing of surgical treatment, yet reported long-term results have been rather similar (see Doroghazi et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:1026- 1034). METHODS: With the aim of comparing the post-surgical history, we have reviewed our results in 288 dissections, 213 type A and 75 type B, operated consecutively between 1 January 1970 and 31 November 1994. Follow-up was 100% complete. Empirical survival of both groups was interpolated with a fully parametric method and the shape and scale of the hazard function was investigated. RESULTS: Survival was not significantly different between type A and type B. Parametric survival was, respectively, 0.52% (70% C.L.: 0.48-0.55) vs. 0.56% (0.51-0.62) at 5 years, 0.44% (0.40-0.47) vs. 0.28% (0.23-0.25) at 10 years, 0.37% (0.33-0.41) vs. 0.25% (0.19-0.32) at 15 years, and 0.31% (0.26-0.35) vs. 0.24% (0.18-0.31) at 20 years. Following the high perioperative risk phase in type A dissection, the intermediate and late risk remains constant at a rate of 0.0033 events/month (3.9% patient-years (pt.- years)). By contrast, the postoperative course of type B dissection shows an intermediate risk phase between 4 and 10 years with an average linearized risk of 9.3% pt.-years and a peak of 20%. This determined lower survival rates (24 vs. 31% at 20 years, P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients with type B dissection have a steeper postoperative death hazard as compared to type A dissection patients. Age confounding or late entry do not explain the difference. This could be possibly related to a greater propensity for expansion, higher risk of malperfusion complications or to limitations of our current surgical treatment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Olsson, S. Thelin, E. Stahle, A. Ekbom, and F. Granath Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection: Increasing Prevalence and Improved Outcomes Reported in a Nationwide Population-Based Study of More Than 14 000 Cases From 1987 to 2002 Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2611 - 2618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-Y. Yu, Y.-S. Chen, S.-C. Huang, S.-S. Wang, and F.-Y. Lin Late outcome of patients with aortic dissection: study of a national database Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 683 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Genoni, M. Paul, R. Jenni, K. Graves, B. Seifert, and M. Turina Chronic {beta}-blocker therapy improves outcome and reduces treatment costs in chronic type B aortic dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 19(5): 606 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]