EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert T. Miyagishima
Gary L. Grunkemeier
Samuel V. Lichtenstein
G. Frank O. Tyers
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamieson, W.R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tyers, G. F. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jamieson, W.R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tyers, G. F. O.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:151-159
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL


Multiple mechanical valve replacement surgery comparison of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prostheses

W.R. Eric Jamieson, A. Ian Munro, Robert T. Miyagishima, Gary L. Grunkemeier, Lawrence H. Burr, Samuel V. Lichtenstein, G. Frank O. Tyers

Department of Surgery, St. Paul’s Hospital-Heart Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 3100-910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver V5Z 4E3, Canada

Received 28 July 1997; received in revised form 8 December 1997; accepted 16 December 1997.

Corresponding author. Tel. +1 604 8754141; fax: +1 604 8754036.

Objective: The experience with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and CarboMedics (CM) bileaflet mechanical prostheses was evaluated to determine thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications and predictive risk factors. Methods: From 1989 to 1994, a total of 246 patients had multiple valve replacement (SJM, 140; CM, 106); concomitant procedures 20.3% (50) [coronary artery bypass 10.6% (26)] and 53.7% (132) previous cardiac surgery, primarily valve replacement procedures. The pre-operative variables [coronary artery disease, previous cardiovascular surgery, concomitant procedures, valve lesion (except mitral stenosis), status, atrial fibrillation, and NYHA III/IV] did not distinguish the prosthesis-type (pNS). Results: The prosthesis-type and the pre-operative variables, including atrial fibrillation, were not predictive of overall thromboembolism (TE). The linearized rate of total TE events for overall multiple replacements (MR) was 5.4%/patient-year (minor, 2.52; major 2.85); the total TE for CM and SJM was 5.4%/patient-year, respectively. The <=30 day major TE crude rate was 0.82%, while the >30 day major event rate was 2.7%/patient-year. Of the total (major and minor) TE events 100% (3) of <=30 days and 72% (29), >30 days had an INR <2.5 at or immediately prior to the event. The thrombosis rate (included in total TE events) was 0.67%/patient-year (4 events, 100% INR <2.5). Of the various TE event categories the prosthesis-types (CM and SJM) were not differentiated (pNS). The freedom, at 5 years, from major/fatal TE, thrombosis and hemorrhage from anticoagulation was 89.3±3.8% for CM and 87.9±3.7% for SJM and, 91.3±3.5% and 89.3±3.7%, respectively, (pNS) exclusive of early events. Conclusions: The performance of the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses in multiple valve replacement surgery in this non-randomized prospective study revealed no significant differences in performance with regard to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

Key Words: Mechanical prostheses • Thromboembolism • Predictive factors and anticoagulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. J. Bryan, C. A. Rogers, K. Bayliss, J. Wild, and G. D. Angelini
Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: Ten-year follow-up
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 614 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Fritzsche, T. Eitz, A. Laczkovics, A. Liebold, M. Knaut, K. Matschke, A. Sagie, U. Mehlhorn, D. Horstkotte, and R. Koerfer
Early Detection of Mechanical Valve Dysfunction Using a New Home Monitoring Device
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 542 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. Vesely
Heart Valve Tissue Engineering
Circ. Res., October 14, 2005; 97(8): 743 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. H. H. Lim, M. Caputo, R. Ascione, J. Wild, R. West, G. D. Angelini, A. J. Bryan, and S. A. M. Calafiore
Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: An interim report
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 21 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.