HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Al-Qudah, A. Articles by Abu- Khalaf, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Al-Qudah, A. Articles by Abu- Khalaf, M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:494-498
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL

Esophageal foreign bodies¹

Sections of Thoracic And General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jordan University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Amman, Jordan

Received 29 September 1997; received in revised form 3 February 1998; accepted 3 March 1998.

Corresponding author. P.O. BOX. 13255, Amman 11942, Jordan. Fax: +962 6 5150669.

Objective: A retrospective review was performed on 180 patients from 1975 to 1997 to evaluate the diagnosis, and management of esophageal foreign bodies. Methods: All patients except two were symptomatic and 145 of them were younger than 14 years of age. Plain films were performed in every patient with a suspected esophageal foreign body (EFB). In all patients, rigid esophagoscopy was done under general anesthesia once the diagnosis of impacted EFB is made. Results: Fifty-five percent of the foreign bodies were coins. In children, the majority of impacted esophageal foreign bodies were located at the level of the cricopharyngeus muscle while in adults the site of impaction was the lower esophageal sphincter. The most common symptoms were vomiting and or regurgitation. Of the 180 EFBs encountered, 169 were extracted endoscopically, five were pushed into the stomach, five were not found, and one patient needed cervicotomy. There were no deaths in this series. Predisposing factors were found in 15 patients. Fifteen patients (8.3%) had benign strictures. In ten patients (5.5%), minor complications were encountered, none of which were esophagoscopically related. Alternative diagnostic and therapeutic modalities are discussed. Conclusions: All patients with a history of suspected foreign body ingestion should have direct endoscopic examination. If the EFB is not detected a thorough radiographic examination, including CT scan, should be performed to detect a possible intra- or extraluminal object. Preservation of the airway is regarded to be the most important consideration in esophageal foreign body management.

Key Words: Esophagus • Esophagoscopy • Foreign bodies • Ingestion • Bougienage

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Roffman, S. Jalisi, R. Hybels, and P. Catalano Failed Extraction of a Sharp Esophageal Foreign Body With a Flexible Endoscope: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, September 1, 2002; 128(9): 1096 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Athanassiadi, M. Gerazounis, E. Metaxas, and N. Kalantzi Management of esophageal foreign bodies: a retrospective review of 400 cases Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 653 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]