HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Yves Lecompte Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van de Wal, H. J.C.M. Articles by Lecompte, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van de Wal, H. J.C.M. Articles by Lecompte, Y.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:551-554
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL

Cardiac surgery by transxiphoid approach without sternotomy¹

^a Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, Massy, France
^b Heart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

Received 29 September 1997; received in revised form 23 February 1998; accepted 2 March 1998.

Corresponding author. Donksestraat 23, NL-5271 TN Sint Michielsgestel, The Netherlands. Tel./fax: +31 73 5943306; e-mail: vandewal@worldaccess.nl

Objective: In a attempt to avoid the potential drawbacks associated with sternotomy coupled with a desire for a smaller scar led us to investigate the transxiphoid approach without sternotomy. We present our preliminary experience and a comparison between the sternal and thoracic approaches. Methods: From June 1996, at the Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France (ICPS) and the Heart Institute, São Paulo, Brazil (HI) the transxiphoid approach was adopted for the correction of selected congenital cardiac defects. The xiphoid was resected through a 6 cm long vertical skin incision. With a special retractor the sternum was elevated cephalad and anteriorly. Closure of the defect was performed in the conventional manner. Twenty-six patients; 17 boys and 9 girls were entered into the study from representing 19 atrial septal defects (ASDs), 4 ventricular septal defects (VSD) and 3 partial atrio ventricular septal defects (AVSD). In addition at ICPS the transxiphoid approach for correction of ASD was compared to the thoracic and sternal approaches performed in the same period. Results: Both the aortic cross clamp time as well as the duration of extracorporeal circulation were increased when compared to either standard sternotomy or thoracotomy approaches. There were no differences within the groups when comparing body surface area, amount of chest drainage or length of either ICU or hospital stay. However the patients in the transxiphoid group showed less pain and respiratory discomfort. Conclusion: Our initial experience with the transxiphoid approach without sternotomy confirms that it is a promising technique that can be considered an alternative to conventional sternotomy. The access is adequate for surgical procedures performed through a right atriotomy. The advantages include a better cosmetic scar, less surgical trauma, minimal respiratory discomfort and a potentially lower risk of infection. However cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp times are increased. There were no complications, and patient satisfaction was high.

Key Words: Atrial septal defect • Transxiphoid approach • Minimal invasive surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Hagl, U. Stock, A. Haverich, and G. Steinhoff Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery : Is a Full Sternotomy Always a Necessity? Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 622 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Cremer, A. Boening, and J. K.W. Scheewe Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 982 - 982. [Full Text] [PDF]