EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, P.R.
Right arrow Articles by Turina, M.I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, P.R.
Right arrow Articles by Turina, M.I.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:619-624
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL


Preoperative predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve reconstruction1

P.R. Vogta, H.P. Brunner-LaRoccab, M. Rista, G. Zünda, M. Genonia, M. Lachata, U. Niederhäusera, M.I. Turinaa

a Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
b Clinic for Cardiovascular Cardiology, University Hospital, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland

Received 19 November 1997; received in revised form 4 March 1998; accepted 10 March 1998.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 1 2551111; fax: +41 1 2554446; e-mail: paul.vogt@chi.usz.ch

Objective: Late outcome after mitral valve repair was examined to define preoperative predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve reconstruction. Methods: One hundred and eighty-nine patients, 112 with preoperative sinus rhythm and 72 with preoperative chronic or intermittent atrial fibrillation, were followed for 12.2±10 years after valve repair. Clinic, hemodynamic end echocardiographic data were entered into Cox-regression and Kaplan–Meyer analysis to assess predictors for recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve repair. Results: Univariate and multivariate predictors for recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve reconstruction were preoperative atrial fibrillation (P=0.0001), preoperative antiarrhythmic drug treatment (P=0.005), heart rate (P=0.01), left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.01) and increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness (P=0.05). Patients>57.5 years with a mean pulmonary artery pressure >=23mm Hg and a history of preoperative antiarrhythmic drug treatment had an odds ratio of 53.33 (95% confidence limits 6.12–464.54) for atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve repair. Conclusion: Older patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, antiarrhythmic treatment or an elevated pulmonary artery pressure may present atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve repair. They could be considered for combined mitral valve reconstruction and surgery for atrial fibrillation even though sinus rhythm is present preoperatively.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • Mitral valve • Late results







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.