EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Beat H. Walpoth
Thierry Carrel
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walpoth, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Carrel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walpoth, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Carrel, T.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:426-430
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL


Assessment of cardiac rejection by MR-imaging and MR-spectroscopy1

Beat H. Walpoth, Markus F. Müller, Bülent Celik, Beatrice Nicolaus, Nazan Walpoth, Thomas Schaffner, Ulrich Althaus, Thierry Carrel

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiology, Radiology and Pathology, University Hospital, Insel, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland

Received 27 October 1997; received in revised form 27 May 1998; accepted 8 July 1998.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 31 6322375; fax: +41 31 6329766; e-mail: beat.walpoth@insel.ch

Background: Detection of cardiac rejection is a major problem in cardiac transplantation. The gold standard is, and remains, endomyocardial biopsy. Purpose: Evaluation of MR-imaging and MR-spectroscopy for detection of cardiac rejection. Methods: Orthotopic cardiac transplantation (HTX) was performed in 13 pigs (body weight 30 kg). All animals obtained immunosuppressive (triple) therapy for 1 week after the operation. Thereafter immunosuppression was stopped to induce cardiac rejection. MRI and MRS (1.5 Tesla General Electrics Signa) were performed pre- and post-operatively on days 10, 17, 24 and 31. The degree of rejection was determined post-operatively using endomyocardial biopsy (Texas grading score). Results: (1) MR-imaging: LV function remained unchanged after HTX. LV mass increased (+42%; P<0.05) with cardiac rejection. (2) MR-spectroscopy: a marked reduction in the ratio of phosphocreatine and adenosine triphosphate, respectively, to inorganic phosphate was observed in the rejecting hearts. (3) Histologic grading confirmed cardiac rejection after stopping immunosuppression. The Texas score was 5.7±0.8 at autopsy. Conclusions: MR-imaging and MR-spectroscopy allow the detection of changes associated with cardiac rejection. Both techniques are correlated with histologic rejection. However, endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for reliable detection of cardiac rejection.

Key Words: Cardiac rejection • MR-imaging • MR-spectroscopy • Histologic grading







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.