HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tran, H. M. Articles by Chard, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tran, H. M. Articles by Chard, R. B.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:602-606
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL

Tunnelling versus open harvest technique in obtaining venous conduits for coronary bypass surgery

^a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia 2145
^b Department of Surgery, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Received 8 June 1998; received in revised form 29 September 1998; accepted 6 October 1998.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +61-2-9845-7994; fax: +61-2-9845-7440.

Background: The tunnelling as opposed to the open harvest technique for harvesting long saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass procedures is a less frequently used technique as it requires more handling of the vein and this may induce trauma. This study aims to compare the degree of endothelial denudation and donor site morbidity between the two different harvest techniques. Methods: Saphenous vein segments in 78 patients (45 in tunnelling versus 33 in open harvest group) undergoing coronary artery bypass procedures were examined by light microscopy and graded according to the extent of endothelial denudation varying from grade 1 (most preserved) to grade 6 (>90% endothelial denudation). Clinical parameters relating to donor site morbidity including leg wound pain and infection were also assessed. Results: There was no statistical difference in the age, sex, macroscopic vein quality, length and time taken to harvest the veins between the two groups. The tunnelling technique always used thigh saphenous vein whereas nearly a third of veins harvested by the open harvest technique were lower leg veins (P=0.001). The tunnelling technique resulted in an endothelial score of 2.5 compared with 3.3 for the open harvest technique (P<0.001). In addition, saphenous vein tunnelling resulted in significantly less leg wound pain (1.2 vs. 1.8, P=0.001), no leg wound infection (compared with 12.2% in open harvest group, P=0.02) and produced cosmetically more acceptable scars. Furthermore, length of hospital stay was significantly prolonged to 19.3 days in those with leg wound infection compared to 8.7 days in those without leg wound infection (P<0.001). Conclusions: These results show that saphenous vein tunnelling is an attractive alternative to the open harvest technique in obtaining venous conduits for coronary artery bypass procedures.

Key Words: Endothelial preservation • Saphenous vein • Coronary bypass

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Dusterhoft, M. Bauer, S. Buz, B. Schaumann, and R. Hetzer Wound-healing disturbances after vein harvesting for CABG: a randomized trial to compare the minimally invasive direct vision and traditional approaches Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2038 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Agarwal, S. K Agarwal, N. K Gupta, and A. K Srivastava Minimally Invasive Saphenous Vein Harvesting Using Conventional Instruments Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2001; 9(3): 246 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Fabricius, A. Diegeler, N. Doll, H. Weidenbach, and F. W. Mohr Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting techniques: morphology and postoperative outcome Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Goel, N. M. Sankar, S. Rajan, and K. M. Cherian Use of direct laryngoscope for better exposure in minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 182 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Carpino, K. R. Khabbaz, R. M. Bojar, H. Rastegar, K. G. Warner, R. E. Murphy, and D. D. Payne CLINICAL BENEFITS OF ENDOSCOPIC VEIN HARVESTING IN PATIENTS WITH RISK FACTORS FOR SAPHENECTOMY WOUND INFECTIONS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2000; 119(1): 69 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]