HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Rony Ammar Eyal Porat Gideon Uretzky Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ammar, R. Articles by Uretzky, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ammar, R. Articles by Uretzky, G.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:S130-S133
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL

Utility of spiral CT in minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement ¹

^a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, 7 Michal Street, Haifa 34362, Israel
^b Department of Radiology, Carmel Medical Center Haifa, Israel
^c Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Technion-IIT, Haifa, Israel

^* Corresponding author. Tel.: +972 4 8250256; fax: +972 4 8343554.

Objective: Several surgical approaches exist for a minimally invasive replacement of the aortic valve. A great concern exists about the variable exposure of the aortic root. We suggest the use of spiral CT as a non-invasive method for accurate determination of aortic annulus position. Methods: Three patients scheduled for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement underwent chest spiral CT, (Select SP, Elscint, Haifa, Israel). Scanning was performed during breath holding using 5-mm thick slices, reconstructed every 2 mm (3 mm overlap), and a 1.5 pitch. Average scanning time was 30 s. No intravenous contrast media was used. Multiplannar and 3D images were reconstructed, using an Omnipro work station (Elscint LTD, Haifa, Israel). The position of the aortic valve annulus, in relation to the anterior chest wall was defined on these images. Results: In all patients, the length and location of the incision were determined by the preoperative measurements. The location of the aortic valve was found highly correlative to the preliminary study. There was no need to extend the length of the incision, or change the surgical approach. Conclusions: We find spiral CT scanning enables accurate pre-operative anatomical assessment. This assessment, provides the surgeon with the advantage of preliminary planning of the appropriate approach for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Key Words: Minimally invasive • Aortic valve replacement • Mid-sternotomy • Parasternal incision • Spiral computed tomography (CT) • 3D reconstruction