EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, F.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, F.W.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:260-265
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL


Quality of computer enhanced totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft anastomosis – comparison to conventional technique1

V. Falka, J.F. Gummerta, T. Walthera, M. Hayaseb, G.J. Berryc, F.W. Mohra

a The Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heartcenter, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
b Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
c Department of Surgical Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

Received 22 September 1998; received in revised form 10 November 1998; accepted 25 November 1998.

Corresponding author. Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Russenstraße 19, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. Tel.: +49-341-865-1421; fax: +49-341-865-1452; e-mail: falv@.medizin.uni-leipzig.de

Objective: Aims of the study were to develop an endoscopic technique to perform robot assisted coronary anastomoses, using a computer enhanced telemanipulator and to compare the quality of the anastomoses with those performed using a standard open technique. Methods: A surgical telemanipulator with two instrument arms and a central videoscopic arm was used to perform remote endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on isolated porcine hearts. The end effectors and the videoscope were placed through three 10 mm port incisions. All anastomoses (Cx to LAD) were performed using a double armed 7–0 Prolene suture of 5 or 7 cm in length. All operations were performed remotely from the master console using ten times magnification, tremor filtering and 3:1 motion scaling. Initially 20 anastomoses were performed to develop and train the technique. Then, 20 robot-assisted anastomoses (group I) were compared with 20 anastomoses using a standard open parachute technique (group II). All anastomoses were checked for patency and leakage. Patency was confirmed by bench angiography. After fixation, all anastomoses were macroscopically evaluated for patency, intactness, alignment, intimal tears and dehiscence. Both angiographic and pathologic evaluations were performed with the examiners blinded to the technique of anastomosis. Results: In the initial feasibility series, time for anastomosis was 18.2±9.1 min. All anastomoses were patent although minor stenoses were found in two and minor leakage was noted in five anastomoses. In the second series all anastomoses were patent, not leaking and showed a good run-off at angiography. Mean time for anastomosis in group I was 12.8±2.4 min as compared with 6.3±0.2 min in group II (P<0.001), respectively. Macroscopic analysis demonstrated equal quality for both groups. There were no stenoses, no intimal tears and no dehiscences. All anastomoses had a normal alignment and intact suture lines. Conclusion: Using the Intuitive surgical telemanipulator, it is possible to remotely perform endoscopic coronary anastomoses with the same quality as with an open standard technique after a brief learning curve. This will enable true endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with a precision that has not been achieved with any other previously applied endoscopic technique.

Key Words: Robotic surgery • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery • Endoscopy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
Y. K Mishra, H. Wasir, K. K Sharma, Y. Mehta, and N. Trehan
Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2006; 14(6): 447 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
R. P.J. Budde, T. C. Dessing, R. Meijer, P. F.A. Bakker, C. Borst, and P. F. Grundeman
Robot-assisted 13 MHz epicardial ultrasound for endoscopic quality assessment of coronary anastomoses
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 616 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Cattin, H. Dave, J. Grunenfelder, G. Szekely, M. Turina, and G. Zund
Trajectory of coronary motion and its significance in robotic motion cancellation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 786 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
P. C. Giulianotti, A. Coratti, M. Angelini, F. Sbrana, S. Cecconi, T. Balestracci, and G. Caravaglios
Robotics in General Surgery: Personal Experience in a Large Community Hospital
Arch Surg, July 1, 2003; 138(7): 777 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. H. Diodato, J. E. Scarborough, P. W. Domkowski, M. L. Smith, S. S. Biswas, T. Schwartz, and K. P. Landolfo
Robotically assisted versus conventional freehand technique during beating heart anastomoses of left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 825 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Murtra
The adventure of cardiac surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 167 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. Kappert, R. Cichon, J. Schneider, I. Schramm, and S. Schuler
Closed chest bilateral mammary artery grafting in double-vessel coronary artery disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1699 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. Kappert, R. Cichon, J. Schneider, V. Gulielmos, S. M. Tugtekin, K. Matschke, I. Schramm, and S. Schueler
Closed-chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart with the use of a robotic system
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2000; 120(4): 809 - 811.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Shennib, S. J. Korkola, N. Bousette, and A. Giaid
An automated interrupted suturing device for coronary artery bypass grafting: automated coronary anastomosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1046 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Falk, F. H. Moll, D. J. Rosa, D. Daunt, A. Diegeler, T. Walther, and F. W. Mohr
Transabdominal endoscopic computer-enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1555 - 1557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.