HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Urs Niederhäuser Burkhardt Seifert Mario Lachat Gregor Zünd Paul Vogt Marko Turina Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Niederhäuser, U. Articles by Turina, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Niederhäuser, U. Articles by Turina, M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:557-563
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

Conservative treatment of the aortic root in acute type a dissection¹

^a Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, City Hospital Triemli, CH-8063, Zurich, Switzerland
^b Institute for Biostatistics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Received 22 September 1998; received in revised form 3 February 1999; accepted 10 February 1999.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41-1-466-1111 or 252-9249; fax: +41-1-466-2745.

Objective: In acute type A dissection long-term results of conservative aortic root surgery were compared with the outcome of primary valve and/or root replacement. Methods: Between 1985 and 1995, 199 patients (mean age 59 years, 154 men) were operated on. The aortic root was involved in the dissection process and valve incompetence of varying degree was present without exception. Replacement of a proximal aortic segment was standard procedure in all patients. The aortic valve was preserved in 126 patients: commissural suture resuspension (12 patients), root reconstruction with GRF-glue (gelatine-resorcin-formaldehyde/glutaraldehyde-glue) (114 patients). Valve replacement was performed in 73 patients (50 composite grafts, 23 valve prostheses with separate supracoronary grafts). Preoperative risk factors (valve replacement vs. preservation): coronary artery disease (11 vs. 8%, NS), tamponade (18 vs. 17%, NS), unstable hemodynamics (22 vs. 15%, NS), renal failure (4 vs. 6%, NS), neurologic disorder (19 vs. 32%, NS). Results: The overall early mortality was 23.6% (47/199 patients) and increased after commissural suture resuspension compared with GRF-glue reconstruction (P=NS). Parameters of the early postoperative period did not differ between conservative treatment and root/valve replacement: low cardiac output, 34 versus 38% (P=NS); myocardial infarction, 10 versus 11% (P=NS); hemorrhage, 25 versus 23% (P=NS); duration of intensive care (P=NS). Survival was 61% after 8 years without difference between the two principal treatment groups (P=NS) and between the two conservative subgroups (P=NS). At 2 years, GRF-glue reconstruction had an increased freedom from reoperation on the aortic root (92 vs. 70%, P=0.0253) and event free survival (77 vs. 41%, P=0.0224) compared with suture resuspension. Commissural suture resuspension was an independent, significant predictor for reoperation (P=0.0221, relative risk=4.7130). Conclusion: Surgery for acute type A dissection still carries a considerable early risk. Preservation of the aortic root is safe in the absence of Marfan or annuloaortic ectasia, but a certain incidence of reoperations on the aortic valve and the aortic root has to be accepted. Root reconstruction using GRF-glue is the method of choice and is superior to suture resuspension, with a significantly better reoperation-free and event-free survival.

Key Words: Aortic dissection • Ascending aorta • Aortic root • Aortic valve • Valve reconstruction • Composite graft

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. W. Erasmi, H.-H. Sievers, J.F. M. Bechtel, T. Hanke, U. Stierle, and M. Misfeld Remodeling or Reimplantation for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): S752 - S756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Lai, D. C. Miller, R. S. Mitchell, P. E. Oyer, K. A. Moore, R. C. Robbins, N. E. Shumway, and B. A. Reitz Acute type a aortic dissection complicated by aortic regurgitation: composite valve graft versus separate valve graft versus conservative valve repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1978 - 1985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Murashita, T. Kunihara, N. Shiiya, H. Aoki, K. Myojin, and K. Yasuda Is preservation of the aortic valve different between acute and chronic type A aortic dissections? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 20(5): 967 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kazui, N. Washiyama, Abul Hasan Muhammad Bashar, H. Terada, K. Suzuki, K. Yamashita, and M. Takinami Role of biologic glue repair of proximal aortic dissection in the development of early and midterm redissection of the aortic root Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 509 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. P. Casselman, M. E. S.H. Tan, F. E.E. Vermeulen, J. C. Kelder, W. J. Morshuis, and M. A.A.M. Schepens Durability of aortic valve preservation and root reconstruction in acute type A aortic dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1227 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]