EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Emre Belli
Alain Serraf
Francois Lacour-Gayet
Claude Planche
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Planche, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Planche, C.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:747-752
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL


Double-outlet right ventricle with non-committed ventricular septal defect

Emre Belli, Alain Serraf, Francois Lacour-Gayet, Michael Hubler, Joy Zoghby, Lucile Houyel, Claude Planche

Marie Lannelongue Hospital, 133, Avenue de la Resistance, 92350 Le Plessis-Robinson, France

Received 10 November 1998; received in revised form 22 February 1999; accepted 11 March 1999.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +33-1-40-94-28-00; fax: +33-1-40-94-55-81

Objective: The term non-committed was used to define hearts in which the VSD was anatomically related to, or was close to, neither great vessel, being separated from both by considerable muscle. We report our experience of the surgical management of this subset, considered being of particular surgical relevance. Methods: Between January 1987 and December 1997, 23 patients having double-outlet right ventricle (DORV) with non-committed VSD underwent biventricular repair. Nine (39%) had undergone previous palliation. The median age was 20 months and the median weight was 8.5 kg. Two main types of repair were used: intraventricular baffle repair (n=21) and arterial switch operation with VSD to pulmonary artery baffle (n=2). At repair, 12 (52%) patients required concomitant VSD enlargement. In two other patients presenting with restrictive inlet VSD associated with tricuspid attachments, crossing the subaortic pathway biventricular repair was abandoned at operation. Results: There were two hospital deaths (9%, 70% CL: 3–19%). Eight patients (35%, 70% CL: 23–48%) underwent nine reoperations, six for subaortic stenosis. No late death occurred. At last visit, all patients were asymptomatic and only two had cardiac medication. Conclusions: The biventricular repair of DORV with non-committed VSD is feasible in the vast majority of cases with comparable results to other subsets of DORV. After repair, the subaortic region is at risk for development of subaortic stenosis.

Key Words: Congenital • Heart septal defects • Ventricular • Double outlet right ventricle







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.