HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Beat H. Walpoth Thierry P. Carrel Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walpoth, B. H. Articles by Carrel, T. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walpoth, B. H. Articles by Carrel, T. P.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:795-802
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

Evaluation of coronary bypass flow with color-Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques: comparison with intraoperative flow measurements

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Radiology and Cardiology, University Hospital Insel, Bern, Switzerland

Received 19 October 1998; received in revised form 17 February 1999; accepted 11 March 1999.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41-31-632-23-73/632-23-75; fax + 41-31-632-97-66/382-02-79
e-mail: beat.walpoth{at}insel.ch

Objectives: After coronary artery bypass surgery, patency and flow assessment is based on invasive methods such as angiography and intravascular ultrasound or flow wire techniques. The aim of the study was to compare intraoperative transit time flow measurements of coronary bypass grafts with early postoperative color-Doppler and MR-imaging assessment. Methods: In 22 patients (62±8.5 years) undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery the flow was measured in all internal mammary artery grafts (IMA) and saphenous vein grafts using the transit time flow technique. Postoperatively (days 5–7) all patients had a color-Doppler IMA graft assessment followed by a MR-angiography and flow measurement (navigator echo phase contrast technique with and without contrast bolus application) to determine patency and graft flow. Results: Data are expressed as the mean±SD). (1) In all patients the left IMA graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) could be identified and flow could be assessed with both color-Doppler and MRI. Venous grafts could only be visualized by MRI. The use of an intravenous contrast bolus enhanced the visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. (2) The mean IMA to LAD flow was 33±17 ml/min intraoperatively by transit time and postoperatively 36±25 ml/min by MR respectively 66±54 ml/min by color-Doppler technique. (3) The systolic/diastolic flow ratio was 0.44±0.12 intraoperatively and 0.43±0.17 postoperatively by MR respectively 0.67±1.0 by color-Doppler. (4) A statistically significant correlation could be demonstrated between intraoperative transit time and postoperative MR flow measurements (r=0.57; P<0.04), whereas the correlations to color-Doppler flow were poor. Postoperatively MR and color-Doppler showed a good correlation of systolic/diastolic flow ratio (r=0.88; P<0.008). Conclusions: The color-Doppler method during echocardiography and MR-imaging are useful non-invasive techniques to visualize postoperative IMA grafts for patency assessment. The quantification of IMA flow is still difficult with either technique, but MR flow measurements showed the best correlation to the intraoperatively measured transit time flow. The MR technique is the most promising non-invasive method for postoperative evaluation of coronary bypass grafts, since it allows visualization and reliable flow quantification.

Key Words: Coronary graft • Blood flow • Color-Doppler • Transit time • MR angiography • MR flow

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Hassanein, A. A. Albert, B. Arnrich, J. Walter, I. C. Ennker, U. Rosendahl, S. Bauer, and J. Ennker Intraoperative Transit Time Flow Measurement: Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2155 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.M. Hartman, J.C. Kelder, R.G.A. Ackerstaff, F.E.E. Vermeulen, and A.J.J.C. Bogers Differences in LIMA Doppler characteristics for different LAD perfusion areas Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1135 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Massoudy, A. Szabo, H. J.C.M. van de Wal, and H. Jakob Intraoperative flow measurement of native coronary artery can help decision making before CABG Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1261 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ishida, H. Sakuma, B. P. Cruz, T. Shimono, T. Tokui, I. Yada, K. Takeda, and C. B. Higgins MR Flow Measurement in the Internal Mammary Artery-to-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Comparison with Graft Stenosis at Radiographic Angiography Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 441 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hirotani, T. Kameda, S. Shirota, and Y. Nakao An evaluation of the intraoperative transit time measurements of coronary bypass flow Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 848 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D'Ancona, M. Ricci, J. Bergsland, T. A. Salerno, and H. L. Karamanoukian Graft Patency Verification in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Principles and Clinical Applications of Transit Time Flow Measurement Angiology, September 1, 2000; 51(9): 725 - 731. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D'Ancona, H. L. Karamanoukian, M. Ricci, S. Schmid, J. Bergsland, and T. A. Salerno Graft revision after transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 17(3): 287 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wiklund, M. Johansson, G. Brandrup-Wognsen, M. Bugge, G. Radberg, and E. Berglin Difficulties in the interpretation of coronary angiogram early after coronary artery bypass surgery on the beating heart Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 17(1): 46 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]