EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Probal Ghosh
Robert Larbalestier
Mark Edwards
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:809-815
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL


Cardiac reoperations in octogenerians

Probal Ghosh, David Holthouse, Ian Carroll, Robert Larbalestier, Mark Edwards

The Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

Received 9 December 1998; received in revised form 22 February 1999; accepted 11 March 1999.

Corresponding author. Harav Zinger 8, Rishon Le Zion 75255, Israel; Tel.: +972-3-964 7843
e-mail: probalg{at}hotmail.com

Objective: In recent years, satisfactory outcome of primary cardiac operation in octogenerians and increased ageing of cardiac surgical population in western hospitals have led to increased expectations and referrals for reoperation. Outcome of reoperation in this aged subset was analysed. Methods: Consecutive 18 octogenerians (mean age 81.2 years, 10 men, eight women) undergoing cardiac reoperations from November 1989 through August 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: They represented 6.2% of all octogenerian cardiac surgical patients and 2.7% of all reoperations during the same period. Mean preoperative NYHA class was 3.4 and Parsonnet score was 29.4. The interval to reoperation was 114.5±11.96 (4–188) months. Priority was urgent in 11 and elective in seven patients. The procedures included four AVRs, five MVRs (including two associated TVAs), six CABGs and one each of MVR with CABG, AVR with CABG and AVR, MVR and CABG. Average graft/patient was 2.3. Mean ICU stay was 4.6±1.5 (1–28) days. There was one hospital death (5.5%) on 18 pod after MVR in an 83-year-old woman. Mean postoperative stay was 20.2±5.13 (8–93) days. There were three late deaths (17.6%) – at 32 months after MVR, at 44 and 63 months after CABG. Long-term survivors were 90% among men and 50% among women who were followed up for 42.7±6.9 (9–93) months. Mean Karnofsky score in survivors at 1 year of follow-up was 78.5±2.9. Despite continued medication in all survivors, mean current NYHA is 1.9 and most have improved lifestyle. Conclusions: Satisfactory outcome may be expected after cardiac reoperations in highly selected octogenerians. However, increased procedural risks, complications, hospital stay and slower convalescence during early follow-up may be anticipated, and will indicate very careful screening. These results indicate a need to reconsider the treatment policy in primary operation with regard to choice of graft conduits and prosthetic valves in other elderly patients.

Key Words: Reoperations • Aged • Aged 80 and over • Heart diseases/surgery







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.