HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Ichiro Shimada Stephen J. Rooney Robert S. Bonser Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shimada, I. Articles by Bonser, R. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shimada, I. Articles by Bonser, R. S.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:59-62
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

Reproducibility of thoracic aortic diameter measurement using computed tomographic scans

^a Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
^b Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
^c Faculty of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-121-6272559; fax: +44-121-6272542
e-mail: r.s.bonser{at}bham.ac.uk

Objectives: Decisions to recommend elective surgical repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) may be based on size or expansion rate, which are used as indices of the risk of rupture. Measurement error may thus affect clinical decision-making. In order to evaluate the reproducibility of aortic diameter measurements of TAA, we assessed departmental inter- and intra-observer variability of measurement of pre-selected computed tomographic scan images of aneurysmal segments of the thoracic aorta. Methods: We compared measurements of minimum aortic diameter made by four observers in 50 pre-selected scans and at different times by two observers using a calliper method and a measurement tool within the scan. Differences in measured dimension were analysed using Wilcoxon's signed ranks test and the repeatability assessed using the method of Bland and Altman. Results: There were no significant inter-observer differences among three observers but there were significant differences between another observer and two other observers (P<0.05). No significant intra-observer differences existed. The best intra-observer repeatability was 2.25 while the worst inter-observer repeatability was 4.37. The mean and maximum difference in measurement were ±0.88 mm and ±8.0 mm, respectively. Variability of measurement increased with aortic diameter. Conclusions: Calliper measurement of TAA is an acceptable measurement method for surveillance of TAA but appears most accurate with a single observer. Increasing error is seen with increasing diameter which may compound error in estimation of expansion rate. Standardisation of technique is advisable for multiple observers and aortic units should adopt quality assurance protocols to minimise error.

Key Words: Thoracic aortic aneurysm • Aortic diameter • Reproducibility

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Zierer, R. K. Voeller, K. E. Hill, N. T. Kouchoukos, R. J. Damiano Jr, and M. R. Moon Aortic Enlargement and Late Reoperation After Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 84(2): 479 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Kalkat, I. Rahman, K. Kotidis, B. Davies, and R. S. Bonser Presentation and outcome of Marfan's syndrome patients with dissection and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 250 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R S Bonser, D Pagano, M E Lewis, S J Rooney, P Guest, P Davies, and I Shimada Clinical and patho-anatomical factors affecting expansion of thoracic aortic aneurysms Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]