EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pascal R. Vouhé
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van de Wal, H. J.C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Leca, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van de Wal, H. J.C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Leca, F.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:104-110
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

Bi-directional cavopulmonary shunt: is accessory pulsatile flow, good or bad?

Henry J.C.M. van de Wal, Ruth Ouknine, Daniel Tamisier, Marilyne Lévy, Pascal R. Vouhé, Francine Leca

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular surgery, Laennec Hospital, Paris, France

Corresponding author. Nieuwe Hescheweg 104, NL 5342 EE Oss, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-412-623213
e-mail: vandewal{at}wxs.nl,

Objective: Evaluation of the effect and long-term outcome of accessory pulsatile blood flow versus classical bi-directional cavopulmonary connection (BCPC). Methods: Retrospective review of the medical and surgical records. Results: Two-hundred and five patients (119 boys, 86 girls) underwent BCPC from 1990 to 1996. Accessory pulsatile flow was present in 68%, flow being maintained through the pulmonary trunc in 46%, systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt in 13% and mixed in 7%, or patent ductus arteriosus in 2%. Patients with accessory pulsatile flow had lower hospital mortality (3% versus 5%), while mean pulmonary artery pressure (14.1 versus 12.6 mmHg P=0.050) and increase of oxygen saturation (12.4 versus 8.7, P=0.034) were significantly higher. The period of artificial ventilation (1.9 day) and ICU stay (6 days) did not differ for both groups. Late mortality was higher following accessory pulsatile flow (6% versus 1%). At late follow-up patients with accessory pulsatile flow had significantly higher oxygen saturation (mean 85±4%, versus 79±4%; P<=0.005). If subsequent completion of Fontan is considered the optimal palliation and subsequent systemic to pulmonary artery shunt, arteriovenous fistula and transplantation is considered a failure, patients with accessory pulsatile flow had significantly more and earlier completion of the Fontan procedure (mean 1.7±2.4 years, versus 2.7±4.4 years; P=0.008). Survival is not influenced by age at bi-directional cavopulmonary shunt surgery, left or right functional ventricular anatomy or previous palliative surgery. One patient with accessory pulsatile flow developed systemic-to-pulmonary collateral's eventually requiring lobectomy. Conclusion: Despite two different initial palliative techniques the outcome was not significantly different. Accessory pulsatile blood flow appeared not to be a contra-indication for a completion Fontan procedure. Moreover, the data suggest that after accessory pulsatile flow can safely be performed, at late follow-up oxygen saturation is higher, while, significantly more and earlier completion of Fontan occurred. Age at bi-directional cavopulmonary shunt, basic left or right ventricular anatomy or previous palliative surgery did not influence survival.

Key Words: Functionally single ventricle • Glenn procedure • Pulsatile blood flow • Follow-up




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. F. Calvaruso, A. Rubino, S. Ocello, N. Salviato, D. Guardi, D. F. Petruccelli, A. Cipriani, K. Fattouch, S. Agati, C. Mignosa, et al.
Bidirectional Glenn and Antegrade Pulmonary Blood Flow: Temporary or Definitive Palliation?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1389 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. A. Berdat, E. Belli, F. Lacour-Gayet, C. Planche, and A. Serraf
Additional Pulmonary Blood Flow Has No Adverse Effect on Outcome After Bidirectional Cavopulmonary Anastomosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 29 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Caspi, T. W. Pettitt, T. B. Ferguson Jr, A. R. Stopa, and S. K. Sandhu
Effects of controlled antegrade pulmonary blood flow on cardiac function after bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 1917 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E. Tireli, M. Basaran, E. Kafali, B. Harmandar, E. Camci, E. Dayioglu, and E. Onursal
Peri-operative comparison of different transient external shunt techniques in bidirectional cavo-pulmonary shunt
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Chikada, A. Sekiguchi, H. Takayama, K. Tonari, A. Saito, and A. Ishizawa
Usefulness of pulsatile bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt in high-risk fontan patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 971 - 972.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.