EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jin, X. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pepper, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jin, X. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pepper, J. R.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:324-330
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

The effects of cardioplegia on coronary pressure–flow velocity relationships during aortic valve replacement

Xu Y. Jin, Derek G. Gibson, John R. Pepper

Departments of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK

Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44-171-351-8530
e-mail: a.garrick{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk

Objective: The acute physiological response of the coronary circulation to aortic valve replacement (AVR) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to characterize the changes in coronary perfusion pressure-flow velocity relationships, and to test whether this relationship is affected by cardioplegic method. Methods: Nineteen patients (mean age 67±12 (SD) years, 9 males) undergoing aortic valve replacement who received either cold blood cardioplegia (CBC, n=9) or warm blood cardioplegia (WBC, n=10), were prospectively studied before and 30 min after the operation, using transesophageal Doppler echocardiography combined with high fidelity left ventricular (LV) and aortic pressures. We thus determined: (1) Diastolic flow velocities in proximal anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and simultaneous aorta to LV pressure differences. (2) The slope (LAD proximal linear resistance) and pressure intercept (zero flow pressure) of this relationship. (3) Overall LAD linear resistance as the ratio of mean diastolic flow velocity to mean pressure difference between aorta and left ventricle. (4) LV myocardial stroke work. Results: Following operation, myocardial stroke work fell from 5.2±2.7 to 3.0±1.7, mJ cm-3 (P=0.001), LAD mean diastolic flow velocity increased from 47±19 to 74±21, cm s-1 (P=0.0002). LAD overall linear resistance fell (0.75±0.24 vs. 1.26±0.26, mmHg cm-1 s, P=0.001). LAD proximal linear resistance, however, remained unchanged (P=0.21), but the zero flow pressure fell (18±12.6 vs. 27±12.2, mmHg above LV end diastolic pressure, P=0.013). With similar fall in myocardial work postoperatively, there was a greater fall in zero flow pressure after WBC than CBC (48±28 vs. 19±13,% of pre-op, P=0.012), and a greater increase in flow velocity time integral (127±81 vs. 53±59,%, P=0.039). Conclusion: Instantaneous diastolic LAD pressure-flow velocity relations in the early postoperative period can be explained more satisfactorily in terms of zero flow pressure and proximal linear resistance than simple resistance alone. The fall in zero flow pressure alone explains the increase in LAD flow velocity immediately after aortic valve replacement. The extent of this fall is greater after warm rather than cold blood cardioplegia.

Key Words: Coronary pressure–flow velocity relationship • Aortic valve replacement • Cardioplegia • Doppler echocardiography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Balacumaraswami, Y. Abu-Omar, J. Selvanayagam, D. Pigott, and D. P. Taggart
The effects of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on intraoperative graft flow in arterial and venous conduits defined by a flow/pressure ratio
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 533 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Aaslid, S. R. Lash, G. H. Bardy, W. H. Gild, and D. W. Newell
Dynamic Pressure-Flow Velocity Relationships in the Human Cerebral Circulation
Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1645 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Kleine, M. Scherer, U. Abdel-Rahman, A. A. Klesius, H. Ackermann, and A. Moritz
Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: Comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2002; 124(5): 925 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.