EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Daniel R Watson
Steven B Duff
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, D. R
Right arrow Articles by Duff, S. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, D. R
Right arrow Articles by Duff, S. B

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:S103-S106
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

The clinical and financial impact of port-access coronary revascularization

Daniel R Watson*, Steven B Duff

Riverside Methodist Hospitals, Columbus, OH, USA

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-614-261-8377; fax: +1-614-261-8695

Objective: Port-access coronary bypass grafting (CABG )was performed in an attempt to impact the clinical course of patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: One hundred patients (56 men and 44 women) with a median age of 61 years underwent port-access coronary revascularization. The clinical and financial profiles of these patients were compared with fiscal year 1997 patients (n=531) who underwent standard median sternotomy coronary bypass. Results: Preoperative clinical demographics were similar in both groups of patients. Among the port-access population there were no incidences of aortic dissection, deep vein thrombosis, conversion to median sternotomy, or death. Total time in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), incidence of atrial fibrillation, transfusion requirements, and (subjective) pain rating at 28 days postoperatively were less in the port-access group. The average hospital cost per case was $2703.00 (US dollars) more in the port-access patients, despite a similar length of stay versus conventional sternotomy patients. Conclusions: Coronary bypass surgery can be performed safely with port-access technology with significant clinical benefits in selected patients. Currently these benefits are attained at a significant cost to the institution.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.