EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Paul R. Vogt
Mario Lachat
Marko I. Turina
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Turina, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Turina, M. I.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:134-139
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL

Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality

Paul R. Vogt, Hans-Peter Brunner-LaRocca, Patrick Sidler, Gregor Zünd, Kaspar Truniger, Mario Lachat, Juraj Turina, Marko I. Turina

Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology, University Hospital, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41-1-255-1111; fax: +41-1-255-4446
e-mail: paul.vogt{at}chi.usz.ch

Objective: The long-term outcome of patients with aortic bioprosthetic valves could be improved by decreasing the reoperative mortality rate. Methods: Predictors of emergency reoperation and reoperative mortality were identified retrospectively in 172 patients who had the first bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 1975 and 1988 (mean age 46±13 years) and were subjected to replacement of the degenerated bioprostheses between 1978 and 1997 (mean age 56±14 years). Emergency reoperation had to be performed in 31 patients (18%). Results: The operative mortality was 5.2% (9/172), 22.6% for emergency (odds ratio 11.17; 95%-confidence limit 4.33–28.85) and 1.4% for elective replacement of the degenerated aortic bioprosthesis (P<0.0001; OR=20.3). Patients who died at reoperation had higher transvalvular gradients before the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.007), received smaller bioprostheses at the first operation (P=0.03), had later recurrence of symptoms after the first aortic valve replacement (P=0.04), a higher pre-reoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P=0.02), and a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (P=0.001) and pulmonary artery hypertension (P=0.009). Endocarditis before the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.004), postoperative pneumonia at the first operation (P=0.005), pulmonary hypertension (P=0.0004) acquired during the interval, later recurrence of symptoms (P=0.04) after the first operation, a lower ejection fraction at the time of reoperation (P=0.03) and acute onset of bioprosthetic regurgitation (P=0.00002) were predictors for emergency surgery. Higher transvalvular gradients at the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.006), coronary artery disease (P=0.003) acquired during the interval, the need for concomitant coronary artery revascularization (P=0.001), sex (P=0.02) and size (P=0.05) and type of the bioprostheses used (P=0.007) were incremental predictors for reoperative mortality which were independent of emergency surgery. Conclusions: Elective replacement of failed aortic bioprostheses is safe. Patients undergoing emergency reoperation have a considerably higher mortality. They can be identified by a history of native aortic valve endocarditis, higher transvalvular gradients at primary aortic valve replacement, smaller bioprostheses, and pulmonary hypertension or coronary artery disease acquired during the interval. A failing bioprosthesis must be replaced at its first sign of dysfunction.

Key Words: Degenerated aortic bioprosthesis • Reoperation • Predictors • Mortality




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Carozza, A. Della Corte, F. Ursomando, and M. Cotrufo
The Choice of Valve Prosthesis for Infective Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Users: Between Evidence and Preference
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1141 - 1141.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. P. Greelish, R. M. Ahmad, J. M. Balaguer, M. R. Petracek, and J. G. Byrne
Reoperative Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1159 - 1174.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. H.L. Tang, M. Maganti, T. E. David, C. M. Feindel, H. E. Scully, and M. A. Borger
Effect of Prior Valve Type on Mortality in Reoperative Valve Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 938 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, A. Vahanian, H. Baumgartner, J. Bax, E. Butchart, R. Dion, G. Filippatos, F. Flachskampf, R. Hall, B. Iung, et al.
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., January 26, 2007; (2007) ehl428v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. M. Davierwala, M. A. Borger, T. E. David, V. Rao, M. Maganti, and T. M. Yau
Reoperation is not an independent predictor of mortality during aortic valve surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2006; 131(2): 329 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. D. Potter, T. M. Sundt III, K. J. Zehr, J. A. Dearani, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, C. G.A. McGregor, F. J. Puga, H. V. Schaff, and T. A. Orszulak
Operative risk of reoperative aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 94 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
W.R.E. Jamieson, L.H. Burr, R.T. Miyagishima, M.T. Janusz, G.J. Fradet, H. Ling, and S.V. Lichtenstein
Re-operation for bioprosthetic aortic structural failure - risk assessment
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 873 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W.R.E. Jamieson, L.H. Burr, R.T. Miyagishima, M.T. Janusz, G.J. Fradet, S.V. Lichtenstein, and H. Ling
Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment
Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-98 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. G. Byrne, B. J. Phillips, and L. H. Cohn
Reoperative Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1047 - 1056.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. S. Geha, M. G. Massad, and N. J. Snow
Replacement of degenerated mitral and aortic bioprostheses without explantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1509 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Alexiou, Q. Chen, S. M. Langley, A. P. Salmon, B. R. Keeton, M. P. Haw, and J. L. Monro
Is there still a place for open surgical valvotomy in the management of aortic stenosis in children? The view from Southampton
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 20(2): 239 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Alexiou, S. M. Langley, M. J.R. Dalrymple-Hay, A. P. Salmon, B. R. Keeton, M. P. Haw, and J. L. Monro
Open commissurotomy for critical isolated aortic stenosis in neonates
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 489 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.