| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:146-153
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, German Paediatric Heart Centre, Sankt Augustin, Germany
b Department of Paediatric Cardiology, German Paediatric Heart Centre, Sankt Augustin, Germany
c Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital, Essen, Germany
Corresponding author. German Paediatric Heart Centre, Johanniter Kinderklinik, Arnold-Janssen-Strasse 29, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany. Tel.: +49-2241-2493-26; fax: +49-2241-249-233
e-mail: andreas.e.urban.md{at}t-online.de
Objective: Outcome after correction of atrioventricular septal defect depends to a great deal on the postoperative function of the left atrioventricular valve. The related role of the zone of apposition (‘cleft’) has been debated: should it be closed (bileaflet repair) or should it be left untouched (trileaflet repair)? This study aims to answer the question by comparing the outcome of patients treated according to these two approaches. Methods: We reviewed all our patients who underwent repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect from 1984 to 1997 and selected those in whom the closure of the zone of apposition in principle would have been possible. Two groups with similar characteristics were constituted: group I (n=63), where the zone of apposition was deliberately not closed as part of a trileaflet repair (postoperative open zone of apposition) and group II (n=96), where it was electively closed as part of a bileaflet AV valve repair (closed zone of apposition). Since we changed from a trileaflet to a bileaflet repair in 1987, the two groups differ in terms of size and length of follow-up. Outcome was compared with regard to survival and freedom from reoperation for left atrioventricular valve incompetence. Late atrioventricular valve function was evaluated by Echo-Doppler. For statistical analysis, we used Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, the Mann–Whitney test and the log-rank test for comparison of Kaplan–Meier curves. The difference was considered statistically significant with a P-value of 0.05 or less. Results: Early mortality was 9.5% (6/63) in group I and 3.1% (3/96) in group II (P=0.16). Actuarial survival after 1, 4 and 8 years was 80.4, 68.4 and 64.8%, respectively, for group I. Actuarial survival for group II was 94.7, 92.1 and 92.1% (P=0.0002). Freedom from reoperation for left atrioventricular valve regurgitation was 90.2, 85.6 and 77.8% for group I at the same time interval. It was a constant 97.9% for group II (P=0.0016). At reoperation, left atrioventricular valve regurgitation was present through the open zone of apposition in 63% of group I cases. The follow-up is 96% (126/131) complete. An increase in degree of left atrioventricular valve incompetence was noted in 28% (11/39) of group I cases and in 9% (8/87) of group II cases (P=0.0131). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the advantage of closing the zone of apposition (‘cleft’) as part of repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect. Survival, freedom from reoperation for left atrioventricular valve incompetence and over-all outcome were more favourable in patients of group II. The zone of apposition should be surgically addressed whenever the morphology of the left atrioventricular valve allows for closure without producing stenosis.
Key Words: Atrioventricular septal defect • Surgery zone of apposition • Outcome • Cleft • Bileaflet procedure • Left AV valve incompetence
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  O. Birim, M. van Gameren, P. L. de Jong, M. Witsenburg, L. van Osch-Gevers, and A. J.J.C. Bogers Outcome after reoperation for atrioventricular septal defect repair Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 83 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Shuhaiber, S. Y. Ho, M. Rigby, and B. Sethia Current options and outcomes for the management of atrioventricular septal defect Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 891 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Dragulescu, V. Fouilloux, O. Ghez, A. Fraisse, B. Kreitmann, and D. Metras Complete Atrioventricular Canal Repair Under 1 Year: Rastelli One-Patch Procedure Yields Excellent Long-Term Results Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1599 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Padala, N. V. Vasilyev, J. W. Owen Jr., J. H. Jimenez, L. P. Dasi, P. J. del Nido, and A. P. Yoganathan Cleft closure and undersizing annuloplasty improve mitral repair in atrioventricular canal defects. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1243 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Suzuki, E. L. Bove, E. J. Devaney, T. Ishizaka, C. S. Goldberg, J. C. Hirsch, and R. G. Ohye Results of Definitive Repair of Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect in Neonates and Infants Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 596 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Backer, R. D. Stewart, F. Bailliard, A. M. Kelle, C. L. Webb, and C. Mavroudis Complete Atrioventricular Canal: Comparison of Modified Single-Patch Technique With Two-Patch Technique Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 2038 - 2046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Boening, J. Scheewe, K. Heine, J. Hedderich, D. Regensburger, H.-H. Kramer, and J. Cremer Long-term results after surgical correction of atrioventricular septal defects Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
