|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:222-227
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
b Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-20-566-4323; fax: +31-20-696-2289
e-mail: patrickayaz{at}hotmail.com
Objective: To test the hypothesis that mitral valve prosthesispatient mismatch increases postoperative mortality. Methods and results: The effect of mitral valve prosthesispatient mismatch on survival in a cohort of consecutive patients after mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis was measured, focusing on the lower tail of the normal distribution curve of the prosthetic valve area index. For the calculation of the geometric valve area index (cm2/m2 body surface area), we used specifications for the geometric valve area supplied by the manufacturer. The cut-off value of the 10th percentile of the valve area index was 1.919 cm2/m2. The study population consisted of 428 adult patients who underwent mitral valve replacement by a Medtronic Hall (n=270, 63%) or a St. Jude Medical prosthesis (n=158, 37%). The size of the valves implanted ranged from 25 mm to 31 mm. The valve area index showed a normal distribution curve ranging from 1.43 to 2.98 cm2/m2 with a mean of 2.2 cm2/m2. Group 1 (n=33) had a valve area index <1.9 cm2/m2 and group 2 (n=395),
1.9 cm2/m2. The 30-day mortality was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (18.2 vs. 4.1%, P=0.005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the determinants of the 30-day mortality rendered a small valve area index (<1.9 cm2/m2) as an independent risk indicator: relative risk 4.3 (95% CI 1.69.5; P=0.0043). The difference in overall survival between the two groups was entirely due to the high 30-day mortality in the patients with small valve area indices, congestive heart failure being the main cause of death. Conclusions: By concentrating on the extreme lower tail of the normal distribution of the valve area index, a strong and independent relation was found between relatively small valves (valve area index <1.9 cm2/m2) and 30-day mortality. We found no influence of valve size on late mortality beyond the first 30 days.
Key Words: Mitral valve Prosthesis Surgery Survival Follow-up study
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Totaro and V. Argano Patient prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement: Myth or reality? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 697 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-K. Lam, V. Chan, P. Hendry, M. Ruel, R. Masters, P. Bedard, B. Goldstein, F. Rubens, and T. Mesana The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1464 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Magne, P. Mathieu, J. G. Dumesnil, D. Tanne, F. Dagenais, D. Doyle, and P. Pibarot Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival After Mitral Valve Replacement Circulation, March 20, 2007; 115(11): 1417 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruel, F. D. Rubens, R. G. Masters, A. L. Pipe, P. Bedard, and T. G. Mesana Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with mitral prosthetic valves J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2004; 128(2): 278 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda, H. Kado, H. Tatewaki, Y. Shiokawa, and H. Yasui Late results after mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthesis in children: evaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 913 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |