HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by El-Fiky, M. M. Articles by Sallam, I. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by El-Fiky, M. M. Articles by Sallam, I. A.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:710-713
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL

Limited right anterolateral thoracotomy for mitral valve surgery

Nasser Institute Hospital, 1351 Korneish El-Nile, Cairo, Egypt

Corresponding author. Tel.: +20-2-432-8768; fax: +20-2-432-8763
e-mail: mfiky{at}misrnet.com.eg

Objective: There has been great enthusiasm in recent years to perform mitral valve surgery through small multiple incisions with the use of the Port Access technique. The procedure is costly, involves a relatively long training curve and leaves the patient with multiple scars in the chest and groin. We used a mini-thoracotomy technique for mitral valve patients and compared our results with the conventional technique. Methods: We randomized 100 consecutive patients presenting to our practice for mitral valve surgery between two groups. The first group (test group) consisted of 50 patients in which mitral valve surgery was performed via mini-right anterolateral thoracotomy approach. The control group (50 patients) underwent classical mitral valve surgery through median sternotomy. Standard aortic and bicaval cannulation with antegrade blood cardioplegia was adopted in both groups. Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups preoperatively regarding their age, pathology, LV function and male/female ratio. Most of the patients had valve replacement except four in the test group and three in the control group. The incision in the test group was 12–15 cm long in the right submammary groove. Direct aortic cannulation, clamping and cardioplegia administration was achieved in all patients easily. The mean bypass time was slightly longer in the test group (64±12 min) when compared with the test group (59±11 min). The cross-clamp time was lower in the test group (27±8 min) when compared with the control group (31±9 min). There was no hospital mortality in both groups and there was one morbidity in the form of sternal infection in the control group. The mean hospital stay was similar for both groups (7±2 days). Conclusion: The cosmetic appearance in the test group was excellent and the patients’ wounds were scarcely apparent in the female patients. The study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of this older technique, with excellent cosmetic results and no additional cost or risk to the patients.

Key Words: Mitral valve replacement • Mitral valve repair • Minimal invasion

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Richardson, M. Richardson, and S. Hunter Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2008; 7(4): 678 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Weissman Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Grossi, A. C. Galloway, A. LaPietra, G. H. Ribakove, P. Ursomanno, J. Delianides, A. T. Culliford, C. Bizekis, R. A. Esposito, F. G. Baumann, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 660 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]