HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khan, I. H. Articles by McGuigan, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Khan, I. H. Articles by McGuigan, J. A.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:656-661
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL

Muscle sparing thoracotomy: a biomechanical analysis confirms preservation of muscle strength but no improvement in wound discomfort

Northern Ireland Regional Thoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK

Received 18 May 2000; received in revised form 31 August 2000; accepted 25 September 2000.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-28-9089-4773; fax: +44-28-9031-4159
e-mail: kieran.mcmanus{at}royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk

Objectives: This study compares the posterior auscultatory triangle thoracotomy incision (muscle sparing) with full posterolateral thoracotomy (where latissimus dorsi muscle is always cut across its full width), with particular attention to the difference between latissimus dorsi muscle strength, post operative pain and chronic wound related symptoms. Methods: Ten patients who had undergone auscultatory triangle thoracotomy (ATT) at least 1 year previously were matched with ten patients who had undergone posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT). Each pair was matched for age, sex, dominant hand, side of the operation, time since operation and presence or absence of history of previous muscle training. Latissimus dorsi muscle strength was assessed by testing the shoulder adduction strength through an arc of 90–0° using isokinetic technique. Early post-operative pain was assessed indirectly by calculating the analgesic requirement in the first 5 post-operative days. A subjective assessment of chronic post-thoracotomy pain was made using a questionnaire presented to the patients at the time of muscle testing. Variability of the torque curves, recorded as coefficient of variance at the time of muscle strength testing, provided objective measurements of chronic pain. Data were analysed using two sample t-tests. Results: All patients reported at least one chronic post-thoracotomy symptom. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of acute or chronic wound pain and other long term wound related symptoms. Shoulder adduction strength was 24% greater in ATT than PLT (95% confidence limits=1–43%, P=0.04). Conclusions: All thoracotomy patients have long term wound related symptoms. This situation is not improved by performing a muscle sparing incision. However thoracotomy through the triangle of auscultation can preserve latissimus dorsi strength which is compromised in a posterolateral thoracotomy incision. We therefore recommend that a muscle sparing thoracotomy be considered for patients where preservation of muscle strength is deemed important, providing the operation is not compromised due to inadequate access.

Key Words: Thoracotomy • Muscle sparing incisions • Muscle strength testing • Post thoracotomy pain

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Fibla, L. Molins, J. M. Mier, A. Sierra, and G. Vidal A prospective study of analgesic quality after a thoracotomy: paravertebral block with ropivacaine before and after rib spreading Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 36(5): 901 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Wildgaard, J. Ravn, and H. Kehlet Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 36(1): 170 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Athanassiadi, S. Kakaris, N. Theakos, and I. Skottis Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 496 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Ochroch, A. Gottschalk, J. G. Augoustides, S. J. Aukburg, L. R. Kaiser, and J. B. Shrager Pain and Physical Function Are Similar Following Axillary, Muscle-Sparing vs Posterolateral Thoracotomy Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2664 - 2670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Shipkov and A. Uchikov The latissimus dorsi muscle previously divided in the course of thoracotomy for empyema cavity obliteration Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 146 - 146. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W.L. Li, R. L.M. Lee, T.W. Lee, C. S.H. Ng, A. D.L. Sihoe, I. Y.P. Wan, A. A. Arifi, and A. P.C. Yim The impact of thoracic surgical access on early shoulder function: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus posterolateral thoracotomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 23(3): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]