|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:179-184
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Academic Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Received 8 August 2000; received in revised form 16 November 2000; accepted 18 November 2000.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-43-3876380; fax: +31-43-3875075
e-mail: fvv{at}scpc.azm.nl
Objectives: Tilting the heart during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) causes a strong decrease in cardiac output. It is hypothesized that this decrease is caused by reduced right ventricular filling and that right ventricular support is thus the best way to restore cardiac output. Simultaneous left and right ventricular pressurevolume loops were used to test this hypothesis. Methods: In seven sheep, the heart was tilted with the use of an Octopus device. After unsupported tilting, a novel right ventricular support, the Enabler, was activated at a pulsatile flow of 1.6 l/min. Pressurevolume loops of both ventricles were obtained using conductance catheters, and cardiac output was monitored with an aortic flow probe. Results: Tilting reduced cardiac output by 31% (4.43.1 l/min, P=0.001) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume by 44% (8651 ml, P=0.005), while right ventricular end-diastolic pressure did not decrease. Left ventricular systolic pressure was not significantly reduced upon tilting and even increased in two animals. During Enabler right ventricular support, the cardiac output remained 23% lower than pre-tilting values (3.4 vs. 4.4 l/min, P=0.001). Conclusions: Restricted right ventricular filling is the primary cause of the strong decrease in cardiac output during tilting. The Enabler right ventricular support can currently not restore cardiac output to pre-tilting values, mainly caused by its limited output and a decrease in right ventricular output upon Enabler activation. Constant monitoring of cardiac output is crucial during (unsupported or supported) tilting as blood pressure alone may not reflect the extent of the reduction in cardiac function.
Key Words: Minimal invasive surgery Assist device Hemodynamics Cardiac output Cardiac volume
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G B Bleeker, P Steendijk, E R Holman, C-M Yu, O A Breithardt, T A M Kaandorp, M J Schalij, E E van der Wall, P Nihoyannopoulos, and J J Bax Assessing right ventricular function: the role of echocardiography and complementary technologies Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(suppl_1): i19 - i26. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Reesink, A. L. Dekker, V. van Ommen, C. Soemers, G. G. Geskes, F. H. van der Veen, and J. G. Maessen Miniature Intracardiac Assist Device Provides More Effective Cardiac Unloading and Circulatory Support During Severe Left Heart Failure Than Intraaortic Balloon Pumping Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 896 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. M Mueller and L. K von Segesser Circulatory support for OPCAB procedures Perfusion, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 305 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |