EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James Tatoulis
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tatoulis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tatoulis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:266-273
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL

The radial artery in coronary re-operations

James Tatoulisa, Brian F. Buxtonb, John A. Fullerc

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
b University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
c Department of Cardiac Surgery, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Received 5 October 2000; received in revised form 21 December 2000; accepted 27 December 2000.

Corresponding author. Suite 28, Private Medical Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville 3050, Victoria, Australia. Tel.: +61-3-9348-1381; fax: +61-3-9347-5258
e-mail: james.tatoulis{at}mh.org.au

Objectives: Vein graft (VG) failure often leads to coronary re-operation (re-do coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)). As the internal thoracic artery (ITA(s)) and VG have often already been used and as the VG has usually failed, the radial artery (RA) is ideally suited for use in re-do CABG. We evaluated our experience where the RA(s) was a key conduit in re-do CABG to determine the safety and efficacy and compared this to re-operations where the RA was not used. Methods: Three hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients who had re-do CABG using the RA(s) from July 1995 to March 1999 were studied: mean age 67.3 years, 209 (60%) angina Class III or IV, past acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 201 (57%), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in 109 (31%). Five hundred and thirty-two RAs were used (bilateral in 180 (51%) patients). Additionally, 232 new left ITAs (66% of patients) and 71 new right ITAs (20% of patients) were placed. A total of 1022 distal anastomoses were performed (mean of 2.9 per patient). Follow-up was at 1 month, 3 months, and yearly. The results were also compared to 730 patients having re-do CABG without an RA (January 1990 to June 1995) using identical operative and myocardial protection techniques. Results: RA spasm was noted intra-operatively in four (1.1%) patients, operative mortality was noted in 14 (3.9%) patients, peri-operative myocardial infarction was noted in ten (2.8%) patients, intra-aortic balloon pump was used in nine (2.6%) patients, stroke was noted in six (1.7%) patients, deep sternal infection was noted in two (0.6%) patients, and re-operation for haemorrhage was performed in seven (2.0%) patients. There was only one (0.3%) forearm infection, and two (0.6%) forearm haematomas required drainage. There was no hand ischaemia. When compared to 730 re-do CABG patients without RA, there were significant differences in arterial grafts used (2.6 vs. 1.2, P=0.01), in deep sternal infection (0.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.01) and donor site infection (0.3% vs. 2.7%, P=0.005) favouring the RA group. Three-year actuarial survival was 89.2% in the RA group and 88.5% in the non-RA group (P=1.0). Conclusions: Use of the RA in re-do CABG is safe, effective, allows additional conduit choice, reduces donor site and sternal infections, and may avoid further late VG failure.

Key Words: Coronary artery • Re-operation • Radial artery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. R. Sajja, G. Mannam, N. R. Pantula, and S. Sompalli
Role of Radial Artery Graft in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2180 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Cameron, S. Trivedi, G. Stafford, and J. H. N. Bett
Five-Year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Bypass Grafts
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-23 - II-26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Haase, A. Sharma, A. Fielitz, S. Uchino, J. Rocktaeschel, R. Bellomo, L. Doolan, G. Matalanis, A. Rosalion, B. F. Buxton, et al.
On-pump coronary artery surgery versus off-pump exclusive arterial coronary grafting: a matched cohort comparison
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 62 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.