HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nashef, S.A.M. Articles by Charman, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nashef, S.A.M. Articles by Charman, S. Related Collections Cardiac - other Professional affairs

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:817-820
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL

The relationship between predicted and actual cardiac surgical mortality: impact of risk grouping and individual surgeons

Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK

Received 11 October 2000; received in revised form 26 March 2001; accepted 3 April 2001.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-1480-364299; fax: +44-1480-364744
e-mail: sam.nashef{at}papworth-tr.anglox.nhs.uk

Objective: To study the relationship between predicted and actual mortality in a cardiac surgical practice and to determine whether there is a consistent relationship across risk groups and surgeons. Methods: Risk information (Parsonnet score) was prospectively collected for 6213 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at one institution. The relationship between predicted mortality and actual mortality was analysed by risk group for all patients and for individual surgeons’ practices. Results: Predicted mortality was 10.2%. Actual mortality was 4.2%, giving a mortality ratio of 41% of predicted. This ratio was not consistent across the five major risk groups, ranging from 32% in moderate risk to 67% in very low risk patients. When analysed by individual surgical practices, the results were even more disparate, with a mortality index range between 0% for one surgeon's low risk patients to 150% for another surgeon's very low risk patients. Conclusion: The relationship between predicted and actual mortality at one institution may vary across the risk spectrum and between surgeons. This should be taken into account in preoperative risk assessment and informed patient consent. Individual surgeons may have strengths and weaknesses which are related to preoperative risk stratification.

Key Words: Mortality • Cardiac surgery • Risk stratification

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Kalavrouziotis, K. J. Buth, and J.-F. Legare Patient selection for minimally invasive aortic valve implantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 32(1): 188 - 188. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bergsland, E. Kabil, E. Mujanovic, I. Terzic, J. Roislien, J. L. Svennevig, and E. Fosse Training of Cardiac Surgeons for Bosnia and Herzegovina: Outcomes in Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 462 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.A. Albert, J.A. Walter, B. Arnrich, W. Hassanein, U.P. Rosendahl, S. Bauer, and J. Ennker On-line variable live-adjusted displays with internal and external risk-adjusted mortalities. A valuable method for benchmarking and early detection of unfavourable trends in cardiac surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 312 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Stoica, L. D. Sharples, I. Ahmed, F. Roques, S. R. Large, and S. A.M. Nashef Preoperative risk prediction and intraoperative events in cardiac surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 21(1): 41 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]