EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawahira, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yagihara, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawahira, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yagihara, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:228-232
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL

Double inlet right ventricle versus other types of double or common inlet ventricle: its clinical characteristics with reference to the Fontan procedure

Youichi Kawahira, Hideki Uemura, Yoshiro Yoshikawa, Toshikatsu Yagihara

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan

Received 9 October 2000; received in revised form 27 March 2001; accepted 15 May 2001.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-6-6833-5012; fax: +81-6-6872-7486
e-mail: ykawahir{at}hsp.ncvc.go.jp

Objective: To determine the clinical features in patients with double inlet right ventricle (DIRV) and separate atrioventricular (AV) valves in terms of the Fontan procedure. Methods: Surgical procedures were carried out in 31 patients with this rare malformation. Their clinical characteristics were compared with similar features in 45 patients with double inlet left ventricle (DILV), 93 with common inlet right ventricle (CIRV), and 20 with common inlet left ventricle (CILV). Results: Pulmonary atresia with the right and the left pulmonary arteries being confluent was seen in 58% of patients with DIRV, and pulmonary atresia with non-confluent pulmonary arteries in 15% (P=0.0001). The incidence of these findings was significantly higher when compared with DILV (P=0.0001). Reflecting these morphologic features, constructions of systemic-to-pulmonary shunts and extensive plasty to the pulmonary arteries were more frequently needed in patients with DIRV than in the others (P=0.04, 0.0001). The AV valves have become moderately or severely regurgitant in three with DIRV (10%). The Fontan procedure has thus been employed in 21 with DIRV (64%), this incidence being significantly higher than that seen in the CIRV (37%) group (P=0.01). Survival rate of 95% at 10 years in this group was as excellent as that in the DILV group, and obviously better than that in either CIRV or CILV (P=0.002). Conclusions: Although multiple palliative procedures might be frequently needed to maintain pulmonary perfusion, the Fontan circulation can be justifiably established in patients with DIRV, and regurgitation across the AV valves was not very common.

Key Words: Double inlet right ventricle • Common inlet ventricle • The Fontan operation • Pulmonary stenosis and atresia • Regurgitant atrioventricular valve







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.