HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Hans-Beat Ris Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Geiser, T. Articles by Ris, H.-B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Geiser, T. Articles by Ris, H.-B. Related Collections Lung - other

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:674-678
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL

Outcome after unilateral lung volume reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema

^a Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
^b Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
^c Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Received 27 November 2000; received in revised form 31 May 2001; accepted 1 June 2001.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41-31-632-2111; fax: +41-31-632-9833
e-mail: thomas.geiser{at}insel.ch

Objective: Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has emerged as a palliative treatment option in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. However, it is not known if a sustained functional improvement can be obtained using an unilateral approach. Methods: We hypothesized that a palliative effect can also be obtained by unilateral LVRS and prospectively assessed lung function, walking distance, and dyspnea before and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after unilateral LVRS. Results: Twenty-eight patients were operated by the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with a mean follow-up of 16.5 months (range 3–36 months). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was significantly improved up to 3 months (1007±432 compared to 1184±499 ml, P<0.001), residual volume up to 24 months (4154±1126 compared to 3390±914 ml, P<0.01), dyspnea up to 12 months (modified Borg dyspnea scale 6.6±1.8 compared to 3.9±1.8, P=0.01) and walking distance up to 24 months (343±107 compared to 467±77 m, P<0.05) after unilateral LVRS compared to preoperative values. Overall, 25 of 28 patients reported a subjective benefit after unilateral LVRS. There was no 30-day mortality. Only two patients required surgery on the contralateral side after 4.5 and 6 months, respectively, both suffering from -1-antitrypsin deficiency. Conclusions: Unilateral LVRS by the use of VATS results in a sustained beneficial effect, improving walking distance and dyspnea for up to 24 months in patients with severe emphysema. The preservation of the contralateral side for future intervention if required renders unilateral LVRS an attractive concept in this difficult palliative situation.

Key Words: Pulmonary emphysema • Lung volume reduction surgery • Unilateral • Outcome • Prospective study • Human • Video-assisted surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. F. Meyers, P. K. Sultan, T. J. Guthrie, S. S. Lefrak, G. E. Davis, G. A. Patterson, J. D. Cooper, and R. D. Yusen Outcomes after unilateral lung volume reduction. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 204 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Ingenito, D. E. Wood, and J. P. Utz Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in Severe Emphysema Proceedings of the ATS, May 1, 2008; 5(4): 454 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Reilly, G. Washko, V. Pinto-Plata, E. Velez, L. Kenney, R. Berger, and B. Celli Biological Lung Volume Reduction*A New Bronchoscopic Therapy for Advanced Emphysema Chest, April 1, 2007; 131(4): 1108 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]