|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:181-186
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL
Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, 3049 Coimbra, Portugal
Received 13 July 2001; received in revised form 18 October 2001; accepted 15 November 2001.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +351-239-400418; fax: +351-239-829674
e-mail: antunes.cct.huc{at}mail.telepac.pt
Objective: To demonstrate that staged, consecutive, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are safe, perhaps preferable, alternative for the treatment of patients with severe carotid and coronary artery disease. Methods: During an 8-year period ending December 1999, 77 (2.1%) of 3633 consecutive patients who were referred for isolated coronary surgery were found to have significant carotid disease and underwent CEA, and subsequently, CABG. The mean age was 65.2±5.9 years and 66 (85.7%) were males. The majority (84.4%) had triple vessel and 19.4% had left main disease. Carotid disease was unilateral in 71 patients (92.2%) and bilateral in six (7.8%), and 57 (74.0%) were neurologically asymptomatic. Only obstructions >70% were considered for endarterectomy. Results: Eighty-three isolated CEAs were performed with direct clamping of the artery (mean 20.1±5.9 min) in all but one. There were no deaths. There were two strokes (2.4%) and three (3.6%) myocardial infarctions (MI). The mean admission time was 6.0±3.5 days. The staging interval was 32.4 days. During coronary surgery, a mean of 2.9 coronary grafts/patient was performed and all but one patient received at least one IMA graft. One patient (1.3%) died. There were two cases (2.6%) of MI and three patients (3.9%) had a stroke. Hence, the overall rates of perioperative mortality, MI and stroke were 1.3, 6.3 and 6.3%, respectively. The mean admission time was 8.3±6.0 days. Conclusions: Staging of carotid and coronary operations resulted in low global perioperative mortality and morbidity rates in these high-risk patients and is a good alternative therapeutic option.
Key Words: Carotid artery stenosis Coronary artery disease Carotid endarterectomy Coronary artery bypass Staged approach
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Hudorovic Reduction in hospitalisation rates following simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting; experience from a single centre Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 367 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Barili, G. Polvani, V. K. Topkara, L. Dainese, and P. Biglioli Concurrent coronary and carotid artery surgery: an open debate Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1258 - 1259. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Randall, F. M. McKevitt, T. J. Cleveland, P. A. Gaines, and G. S. Venables Is There Any Benefit From Staged Carotid and Coronary Revascularization Using Carotid Stents?: A Single-Center Experience Highlights the Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 435 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Ali Staged carotid and coronary surgery for concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 327 - 327. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Minami, D. Boethig, and R. Koerfer Combined carotid and coronary artery disease: advantage of simultaneous operation using cardiopulmonary bypass for both procedures Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 328 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Antunes and P. E. Antunes Reply to Minami et al. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 329 - 330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Antunes and M. J. Antunes Reply to Ali Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 327 - 328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |