HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pinna-Pintor, P. Articles by Alfieri, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pinna-Pintor, P. Articles by Alfieri, O. Related Collections Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:199-204
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL

Inaccuracy of four coronary surgery risk-adjusted models to predict mortality in individual patients

^a Arturo Pinna Pintor Foundation, Via A. Vespucci 61, 10129 Turin, Italy
^b I.S.I. (Institute for Scientific Exchange), Turin, Italy

Received 31 October 2000; received in revised form 21 September 2001; accepted 21 November 2001.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-011-593911; fax: +39-011-5683893
e-mail: fappto{at}tin.it

Objectives: This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of four different risk-adjusted models in predicting mortality in individual patients who are undergoing coronary artery by-pass graft surgery. In the last decade several models to stratify patients before open heart surgery, according to factors affecting mortality, were developed with the aim of retrospectively comparing outcomes of open heart surgery, based on reliable stratification of case-mix, and of prospectively identifying high risk patients as a basis for a meaningful informed consent for patients counseling. Methods: The pre-operative risk of death was calculated with four different models in 418 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery by-pass surgery and then compared with the actual outcome. To discriminate patients with favorable and unfavorable outcome, the logistic regression analysis and the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves were applied. The accuracy score was used to evaluate the reliability of each score to predict the individual outcome. Results: Seven deaths (1.7%) were observed within 30 days from the operation, and the overall incidence was similar to that predicted by all models. Only the NBI score was not able to discriminate survivors from patients who will die, and the areas under the curves were 0.596 for the Parsonnet score, 0.861 for the Cleveland Clinic Foundation score, 0.823 for the French score, and 0.806 for the EuroSCORE. The four models were highly accurate (between 0.97 and 0.98) to predict the overall mortality. In seven patients who died the mean predictive scores were very low and ranged between 2.1 and 4.6, but were significantly higher than those of patients who survived (between 1.1 and 2.2). Conclusions: The four pre-surgical predictive models were similarly able to discriminate favorable vs. unfavorable outcomes and highly accurate to predict overall mortality, but very inaccurate to predict mortality in individual patients.

Key Words: Predictive models • Coronary artery by-pass graft surgery • Risk-adjusted mortality

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D'Errigo, F. Seccareccia, S. Rosato, V. Manno, G. Badoni, D. Fusco, C. A. Perucci, and the Research Group of the Italian CABG Outcome Pro Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG Outcome Project Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 325 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Nilsson, M. Ohlsson, L. Thulin, P. Hoglund, S. A.M. Nashef, and J. Brandt Risk factor identification and mortality prediction in cardiac surgery using artificial neural networks J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Nilsson, L. Algotsson, P. Hoglund, C. Luhrs, and J. Brandt Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2006; 27(7): 867 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Rexius, G. Brandrup-Wognsen, J. Nilsson, A. Oden, and A. Jeppsson A Simple Score to Assess Mortality Risk in Patients Waiting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 577 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Shahian, E. H. Blackstone, F. H. Edwards, F. L. Grover, G. L. Grunkemeier, D. C. Naftel, S. A.M. Nashef, W. C. Nugent, and E. D. Peterson Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position Article Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1868 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Biancari, J. Lahtinen, S. Lepojarvi, P. Rainio, E. Salmela, R. Pokela, M. Lepojarvi, J. Satta, and T. S. Juvonen Preoperative C-reactive protein and outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2007 - 2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Varela, N. Novoa, M.F. Jimenez, and G. Santos Applicability of logistic regression (LR) risk modelling to decision making in lung cancer resection Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 12 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]