HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Richard D. Page Aung Y. Oo Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Page, R. D. Articles by Pennefather, S. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Page, R. D. Articles by Pennefather, S. H. Related Collections Esophagus - cancer

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:666-672
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL

Intravenous hydration versus naso-jejunal enteral feeding after esophagectomy: a randomised study

^a Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK
^b Department of Anaesthesia, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK

Received 12 April 2002; received in revised form 2 August 2002; accepted 5 August 2002.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-151-228-1616; fax: +44-151-220-8573
e-mail: richard.page{at}ccl-tr.nwest.nhs.uk

Objective: Patients undergoing esophagectomy are typically nutritionally depleted and cannot establish oral feeding for up to a week after surgery. We have investigated the routine use of enteral feeding via a naso-jejunal tube. Methods: Forty consecutive patients undergoing a transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer were randomised to receive enteral feeding or intravenous crystalloid fluids after surgery. Nutritional indices were obtained prior to surgery and on the 7th post-operative day. Results: There were no post-operative deaths. Non-fatal complications occurred in 10 patients, without difference in morbidity between the two groups. Lean body mass did not change in either group over the study period. No differences in any other parameters were identified between the two groups. Conclusion: Enteral feeding via a naso-jejunal tube is safe and well tolerated after esophagectomy. It is a simple method of providing nutritional support prior to the re-introduction of oral feeding. However it provides no measurable benefit over intravenous hydration only for patients undergoing routine esophagectomy.

Key Words: Enteral feeding • Esophagectomy • Nutrition

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Page, M. J. Shackcloth, G. N. Russell, and S. H. Pennefather Reply to Kant Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 359 - 360. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.S. Pramesh, R. C. Mistry, R. K. Deshpande, and S. Sharma Enteral feeding access with feeding jejunostomy is advisable after esophagectomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 648 - 649. [Full Text] [PDF]