EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mattia Glauber
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bevilacqua, S.
Right arrow Articles by Glauber, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bevilacqua, S.
Right arrow Articles by Glauber, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:552-559
© 2003 Elsevier Science NL


Mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: is pericardial posterior annuloplasty a durable option?

Stefano Bevilacquaa*, Alfredo Giuseppe Cerilloa, Jacopo Gianettia, Umberto Paradossia, Massimiliano Mariania, Sacha Matteuccib, Enkel Kallushia, Mattia Glaubera

a Cardiac Surgery Department, National Research Council, Ospedale G. Pasquinucci CNR-CREAS, v Massa, Italy
b Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy

Received 5 September 2002; received in revised form 16 December 2002; accepted 22 December 2002.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-0585-4936-04; fax: +39-0585-4936-14
e-mail: bevilacqua{at}ifc.cnr.it

Objective: Biological and prosthestic rings are available for supporting mitral valve repair (MVR). Contrasting data are reported on the durability of pericardial ring annuloplasty. This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the durability of MVR for degenerative regurgitation with posterior annuloplasty performed with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. Methods: From August 1995 through December 2000, 133 patients underwent mitral repair for degenerative regurgitation (86 men, age 62.9±11.5 years). Thirty patients (22.6%) underwent combined coronary artery bypass graft and fourteen (10.5%) underwent tricuspid annuloplasty. Associated aortic disease, previous cardiac surgery and endocarditis were considered exclusion criteria. Results: Seventy-seven patients (57.9%) received a Carpentier–Edwards ring and 56 received (42.1%) an autologous pericardium ring. Thirty-day mortality was 3.8%. Mean follow-up, 98.3% complete, was of 35.6±18.7 months. Five-year freedom from reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation>=3+/4+ was significantly higher in the prosthetic ring group (90.1% – CL90%: 81.9–98.3%) compared with the pericardial ring group (62.6% – CL90%: 43.1–82.1%; P=0.027). Prosthetic ring implantation (P=0.004; RR=0.11) and preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class<=II (P=0.011; RR=0.16) were independently related to a lower risk of reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation>=3+/4+, by multivariate analysis. Five-year overall survival was 91.4% (CL90%: 87.9.7–95%). A higher preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P=0.006; RR=1.17) and the severity of associated coronary artery disease (P=0.021; RR=2.00) were independent predictive factors for poor survival by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Posterior pericardial annuloplasty can jeopardize reproducibility and durability of MVR for degenerative regurgitation.

Key Words: Mitral valve repair • Pericardial ring annuloplasty • Reoperation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Kanani, V. Tsang, A. Cook, and M. Kostolny
Re-repair of the left atrioventricular valve in atrioventricular septal defects: the morphologic approach to the role of Gore-tex band reduction annuloplasty
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2010; 37(2): 273 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. M. Gillinov, K. Tantiwongkosri, E. H. Blackstone, P. L. Houghtaling, E. R. Nowicki, J. F. Sabik III, D. R. Johnston, L. G. Svensson, and T. Mihaljevic
Is prosthetic anuloplasty necessary for durable mitral valve repair?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
T. Chee, R. Haston, A. Togo, and S. G. Raja
Is a flexible mitral annuloplasty ring superior to a semi-rigid or rigid ring in terms of improvement in symptoms and survival?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2008; 7(3): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Maisano, A. Blasio, A. Caldarola, C. Savini, and O. Alfieri
A Method to Avoid Annular Downsizing During Knot Tying
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1484 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.