EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muir, A.D.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, A.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muir, A.D.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, A.N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - other

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:799-804
© 2003 Elsevier Science NL


Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre

A.D. Muir, J. White, J.A. McGuigan, K.G. McManus, A.N. Graham*

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK

Received 3 September 2002; received in revised form 19 December 2002; accepted 22 January 2003.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-2890-240503; fax: +44-2890-314159
e-mail: alastair.graham{at}royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk

Objective: The diagnosis and management of oesophageal perforation continues to challenge clinicians. We present our experience of perforated oesophagus in a Tertiary Referral Centre for Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery. Methods: Between 1985 and 2000, 75 patients (40 male) with oesophageal perforation were treated in out unit; age range 24–89, median 63. Retrospective review of these cases has been performed. Results: There were 12 deaths (16%). With increases in time from perforation to diagnosis, there was a stepwise increase in the mortality rate. Immediate diagnosis 5%; early diagnosis (1–24 h) 14%; late diagnosis (>24 h) 44% (P>=0.002). Site of perforation, aetiology, and treatment strategy had no influence on mortality. The only independent predictor of mortality identified was time to diagnosis from perforation (beta 0.429, P=0.001). Time to definitive management in those undergoing an operative procedure had no influence on outcome with multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Prompt recognition of the diagnosis of oesophageal perforation and rapid institution of supportive measures, followed by an appropriate, patient specific treatment option optimises the chance of a successful outcome. The wide range of presentation of oesophageal perforation necessitates individualisation of treatment.

Key Words: Oesophageal perforation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
I. Paul, B. Badmanaban, and A.N.J. Graham
Perforation of the lower thoracic oesophagus following crush injury to the chest and abdomen
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 526 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. D. Muir and A. Graham
Primary esophageal repair for Boerhaave's syndrome whatever the free interval between perforation and treatment
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 356 - 356.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.