EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Lawrence H. Cohn
Tomislav Mihaljevic
James D. Rawn
John G. Byrne
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farivar, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farivar, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:527-534
© 2003 Elsevier Science NL


Transcriptional profiling and growth kinetics of endothelium reveals differences between cells derived from porcine aorta versus aortic valve

R. Saeid Farivar*, Lawrence H. Cohn, Edward G. Soltesz, Tomislav Mihaljevic, James D. Rawn, John G. Byrne

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Received 18 September 2002; received in revised form 30 May 2003; accepted 16 June 2003.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-617-285-5585; fax: +1-617-732-6559
e-mail: sfarivar{at}partners.org

Objective: Valvular tissue and aorta calcify at different rates when placed as fresh homografts or cryopreserved allografts. Furthermore, differences between valvular endothelial cells and aortic endothelial cells are not well appreciated. We established primary cultures of valve and aortic endothelial cells derived from swine and tested transcriptional and proliferative differences on various extracellular matrices. Methods: Transcriptional profiling was performed on primary cultures of porcine valve and aortic endothelial cells. We extracted total RNA from both cell types and created cDNA libraries. We scored for 847 genes important in signal transduction pathways, and measured their expression on valve and aortic endothelial cells. To determine if there were functional differences between aortic and valvular cells, their growth rate was determined by cell counting on various extracellular matrices. Results: Of 847 genes investigated, 69 (8.1%) were transcriptionally active on aortic endothelial cells and 89 (10.5%) on valve endothelial cells. Common to both cell types were 55 genes, which represents 79.7% (55/69) of activated genes on aortic endothelial cells and 61.8% (55/89) of those in valve endothelial cells. Remarkable features of the analysis included Ephrin ligand and receptor specificity for cell type, a potential fibroblast growth factor autocrine loop in both cell types, as well as upregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor in valvular cells. Aortic endothelial cells were noteworthy of upregulation of vascular endothelial cell growth factor-B and vascular cell adhesion molecule. Proliferation analysis revealed that valve endothelial cells grew more rapidly (12-fold over control) than aortic endothelial cells (3-fold over control). Furthermore, valve endothelial cells proliferated most rapidly on gelatin or collagen, whereas aortic endothelial cells were most proliferative on lysine or laminin. Conclusions: Valve and aortic endothelial cells have different transcriptional and proliferative profiles. The knowledge of these differences may be an exploitable strategy in the future rational design of artificially engineered valve surfaces and in the study of the valve antigenicity, immunogenicity and structural failure.

Key Words: Endothelial cell • Valve • Microarray • Cell culture • Pig




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. O. Peltonen, P. Taskinen, Y. Soini, J. Rysa, J. Ronkainen, P. Ohtonen, J. Satta, T. Juvonen, H. Ruskoaho, and H. Leskinen
Distinct Downregulation of C-Type Natriuretic Peptide System in Human Aortic Valve Stenosis
Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1283 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. T. Butcher, S. Tressel, T. Johnson, D. Turner, G. Sorescu, H. Jo, and R. M. Nerem
Transcriptional Profiles of Valvular and Vascular Endothelial Cells Reveal Phenotypic Differences: Influence of Shear Stress
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 69 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. A. Simmons, G. R. Grant, E. Manduchi, and P. F. Davies
Spatial Heterogeneity of Endothelial Phenotypes Correlates With Side-Specific Vulnerability to Calcification in Normal Porcine Aortic Valves
Circ. Res., April 15, 2005; 96(7): 792 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. F. Davies, A. G. Passerini, and C. A. Simmons
Aortic Valve: Turning Over a New Leaf(let) in Endothelial Phenotypic Heterogeneity
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2004; 24(8): 1331 - 1333.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. T. Butcher, A. M. Penrod, A. J. Garcia, and R. M. Nerem
Unique Morphology and Focal Adhesion Development of Valvular Endothelial Cells in Static and Fluid Flow Environments
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2004; 24(8): 1429 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.