HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Alex R.J. Cale Steven C. Griffin Michael E. Cowen Levent Guvendik Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alex, J. Articles by Guvendik, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alex, J. Articles by Guvendik, L. Related Collections Cardiac - other Education Professional affairs

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:111-115
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL

Surgical nurse assistants in cardiac surgery: a UK trainee's perspective

Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, Hull, UK

Received 11 July 2003; received in revised form 22 August 2003; accepted 29 August 2003.

^* Corresponding author. The Cottage, Main Road, Covenham St. Bartholomew, Louth LN11 0PF, UK. Tel./fax: +44-1507-363541
e-mail: mrjosephalex{at}yahoo.co.uk

Objective: To assess the impact of surgical nurse assistants on surgical training based on a comparative audit of case-mix and outcome of coronary revascularizations assisted by surgical nurse assistants vs. surgical trainees. Methods: Relevant recent articles on Calman reform of specialist training and European working time directive (EWTD) on junior doctor working hours were reviewed for the discussion. For the audit prospectively entered data of elective and expedite first time coronary artery bypass grafting cases from 2000 to 2003 were analysed. Group A (n=233, Consultant+Surgical nurse assistant), group B (n=1067, Consultant+Junior surgical trainee). Chi-square test, t-test and Fisher's test were used as appropriate for statistical analysis. Results: Comparative preoperative variables were gender (P=0.8), body mass index (P=0.9), smoking (P=0.3), diabetes mellitus (P=0.2), hypertension (P=1), peripheral vascular disease (P=0.5), previous cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (P=0.3), renal dysfunction (P=0.4), preoperative rhythm disturbances (P=0.3), previous Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) (P=0.4), Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (P=0.4), New York Heart Association heart failure class (P=0.4) and left ventricular function (P=0.4). Patients in group B were of higher risk due to age (P=0.01), coronary disease severity (P=0.05), left main stem disease (P=0.001), Parsonnet score (P=0.0001) and Euroscore (P=0.005. Regarding the myocardial protection technique, intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation was used more frequently in group A while antegrade–retrograde cold blood cardioplegia and off-pump coronary artery bypass were used more in group B (P=0.0001). The cross-clamp (P=0.0001) and operation time (P=0.0001) were significantly lower in group A despite a comparable mean number of grafts (P=0.2). There was no significant difference in the immediate postoperative outcome ventilation time (P=0.2), intensive care unit stay, postoperative stay (P=0.2), re-exploration for bleeding (P=0.5), inotrope+intra-aortic balloon pump (P=0.2), postoperative MI (P=0.9), postoperative rhythm disturbances (P=0.9), CVA/TIA (P=0.8), renal dysfunction (P=0.6), wound infection (P=0.7), sternal re-wiring (P=0.2), multi-organ failure (P=0.4) or mortality (P=0.1). Conclusions: Surgical nurse assistants can be used effectively in low-risk cases without compromising postoperative results. However, initiatives to tackle the EWTD should be focused on areas that do not compromise the training needs of junior surgical trainees. An intermediate grade between the present senior house officer and registrar grades could be a way forward.

Key Words: Coronary revascularization • Surgical nurse assistant • Outcome • European working time directive • Training

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Palan, A. Gulati, J. G. Andrew, D. W. Murray, D. J. Beard, and the EPOS study group The trainer, the trainee and the surgeons' assistant: CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2009; 91-B(7): 928 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Shuhaiber, K. Goldsmith, and S. A.M. Nashef Impact of Cardiothoracic Resident Turnover on Mortality After Cardiac Surgery: A Dynamic Human Factor Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C A Bruce, I A Bruce, and L Williams The impact of surgical care practitioners on surgical training J R Soc Med, September 1, 2006; 99(9): 432 - 433. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Sadaba and G. H. Wheatley Surgical assistants and working time directives Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1131 - 1131. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Shrivastava, E. Akowuah, and G. J. Cooper Surgical nurse assistants in cardiac surgery: a UK trainee's perspective Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 905 - 905. [Full Text] [PDF]