HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Truls Myrmel David T.M. Lai D. Craig Miller Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Myrmel, T. Articles by Miller, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Myrmel, T. Articles by Miller, D. C. Related Collections Great vessels Related Article

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:236-242
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL

Review

Can the principles of evidence-based medicine be applied to the treatment of aortic dissections?

^a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
^b Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Northern Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway

Received 4 May 2003; received in revised form 17 November 2003; accepted 19 November 2003.

^* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Northern Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway. Tel.: +47-776-26612; fax: +47-772-28298
e-mail: truls.myrmel{at}unn.no

Surgical treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissections has improved early survival from 10–20 to approximately 80%. Data supporting several other treatment recommendations in patients with aortic dissection, however, are less convincing. We hypothesized that applying strict principles of evidence-based medicine would invalidate most of the recommendations in these published papers. We conducted a literature search asking three questions: (1) Is the use of routine circulatory arrest and an ‘open distal’ anastomosis technique better than traditional aortic cross clamping? (2) Does a persistent false lumen in the distal aorta wall have an adverse influence on long-term event-free survival? and (3) Is primary surgical or medical treatment of patients with Stanford acute type B dissections preferable in terms of long-term event-free survival? We searched Entrez Pubmed (National Library of Medicine) for all papers on these topics from 1980 to January 2003. Screening 3164 papers identified using the search terms ‘aortic dissection’ and ‘treatment’ yielded 15 papers fulfilling a set of a priori inclusion criteria. No study had a design that allowed unequivocal conclusions; moreover, the heterogeneity in study design and patient populations precluded formal meta-analysis. The difficulties inherent in conducting stringent clinical studies addressing various treatment strategies for patients with aortic dissection hamper their quality and weaken their recommendations for different treatment options. Specifically, no conclusive evidence exists favoring use of an open distal anastomosis in patients with acute type A dissections or complete elimination of flow in the distal aortic false lumen; similarly, medical therapy of patients with acute type B aortic dissections has no proven advantage over surgical treatment.

Key Words: Aortic dissection • Literature-review • Distal aortic anastomosis • Aortic false lumen

Related Article

Editorial comment: The potatoes and the bottle

Jean Bachet
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004 25: 243-245. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Marui, T. Mochizuki, T. Koyama, and N. Mitsui Degree of fusiform dilatation of the proximal descending aorta in type B acute aortic dissection can predict late aortic events. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1163 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bachet Editorial comment: Ascending aorta cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 979 - 981. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bachet, F. Larrazet, B. Goudot, G. Dreyfus, T. Folliguet, F. Laborde, and D. Guilmet When Should the Aortic Arch Be Replaced in Marfan Patients? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): S774 - S779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Centofanti, R. Flocco, F. Ceresa, M. Attisani, M. L. Torre, L. Weltert, and A. M. Calafiore Is Surgery Always Mandatory for Type A Aortic Dissection? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1658 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ochiai, Y. Imoto, M. Sakamoto, Y. Ueno, T. Sano, H. Baba, and A. Sese Long-Term Effectiveness of Total Arch Replacement for Type A Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1297 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Albes, U. A. Stock, and M. Hartrumpf Restitution of the Aortic Valve: What is New, What is Proven, and What is Obsolete? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1540 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.-B. Hsu, Y.-L. Ho, R. J. Chen, S.-S. Wang, F.-Y. Lin, and S.-H. Chu Outcome of Medical and Surgical Treatment in Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 790 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]