EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marc Ruel
Alexander Kulik
Fraser D. Rubens
Roy G. Masters
Thierry G. Mesana
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mesana, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mesana, T. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:364-370
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL


Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves

Marc Ruela,b*, Alexander Kulika, Fraser D. Rubensa, Pierre Bédarda, Roy G. Mastersa, Andrew L. Pipea, Thierry G. Mesanaa

a Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Suite 3403, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1Y 4W7
b Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5

Received 19 October 2003; received in revised form 7 December 2003; accepted 15 December 2003.

* Corresponding author. Address: Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Suite 3403, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7. Tel.: +1-613-761-4893; fax: +1-613-761-4713
e-mail: mruel{at}ottawaheart.ca

Objectives: Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort. Methods: Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21179 patient-years; mean 6.6±5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods. Results: Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11±0.04; P<0.001 for aortic, and 0.42±0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3±6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; P=0.018). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses. Conclusions: These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.

Key Words: Valves • Follow-up studies • Prosthesis • Surgery • Complications




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. H. Stone
Current selection of optimal prosthetic aortic valve replacement in middle-aged patients: still dealer's choice.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 10, 2009; 54(20): 1869 - 1871.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Price, H. Lapierre, L. Ressler, B.-K. Lam, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel
Prosthesis-patient mismatch is less frequent and more clinically indolent in patients operated for aortic insufficiency
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 639 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Kulik, N. T. Kouchoukos, and M. Ruel
Avoiding prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly: options other than mechanical prostheses.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1049 - 1050.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil
Prosthetic Heart Valves: Selection of the Optimal Prosthesis and Long-Term Management
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 1034 - 1048.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Kulik, B-K Lam, F D Rubens, P J Hendry, R G Masters, W Goldstein, P Bedard, T G Mesana, and M Ruel
Gender differences in the long-term outcomes after valve replacement surgery
Heart, February 1, 2009; 95(4): 318 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Eitz, S. Schenk, D. Fritzsche, A. Bairaktaris, O. Wagner, H. Koertke, and R. Koerfer
International Normalized Ratio Self-Management Lowers the Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Prosthetic Heart Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 949 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Kulik and M. Ruel
Reply to Wu and Grunkemeier
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 30(6): 954 - 954.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Bottio, M. Valente, G. Rizzoli, V. Tarzia, G. Bisleri, E. Pettenazzo, G. Gerosa, and G. Thiene
Commissural dehiscence: a rare and peculiar cause of porcine valve structural deterioration.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1017 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Kulik, P. Bedard, B-K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, P. J. Hendry, R. G. Masters, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 485 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Ruel, H. Al-Faleh, A. Kulik, K. L. Chan, T. G. Mesana, and I. G. Burwash
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1036 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. V. Freeman and C. M. Otto
Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies
Circulation, June 21, 2005; 111(24): 3316 - 3326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ruel, A. Kulik, B. K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, P. J. Hendry, R. G. Masters, P. Bedard, and T. G. Mesana
Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 425 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.