EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Shekar L.C. Reddy
Asif Hasan
John Dark
Stephan W. Schueler
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, S. L.C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, S. L.C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:605-609
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL


Mechanical versus medical bridge to transplantation in children. What is the best timing for mechanical bridge?

Shekar L.C. Reddy*, Asif Hasan, Leslie R.J. Hamilton, John Dark, Stephan W. Schueler, David T. Bolton, Simon R. Haynes, Jon H. Smith

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK

Received 16 November 2003; received in revised form 20 January 2004; accepted 21 January 2004.

* Corresponding author. Address: 40 Langham Close, North Baddesely, Southampton, Hampshire, SO52 9NT United Kingdom. Tel.: +44-2380-731674; fax: +44-2380-731674
e-mail: reddylcs{at}aol.com

Objective: Precise timing of mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation is crucial for successful outcome. In our practice, increasing metabolic injury resulting from third organ (renal/gut) dysfunction is an indication for mechanical circulatory support. It is not known how metabolic injury would influence the outcomes in these patients. In this study we compared biochemical and clinical parameters between children who received mechanical circulatory support and those who were treated with medical management alone as a bridge to transplantation. Methods: Data from 24 patients were retrospectively analysed from their records. There were 11 patients in the mechanical group. In this group, five patients received biventricular assist device, five received veno arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation and one received left ventricular assist device. In the medical group, there were 13 patients who received various levels of inotropic support before transplantation. Five clinical and three biochemical parameters were identified and compared between the mechanical and medical groups. Mortality prior to transplantation was also compared between the two groups. Transplantation was the end point of the study. Results: Serum creatinine and serum lactate levels were significantly higher in the mechanical group (P=0.006 and 0.001, respectively), reflecting advanced metabolic injury in these patients. Mean fractional shortening in the mechanical group was 8.4%, compared to 14.5% in the medical group which was statistically significant (P=0.02). All of the 11 patients in the mechanical group were ventilated compared to 7 of the 13 (53.8%) in the medical group. Need for renal support was higher in the mechanical group (83.3%) in comparison to none in the medical group (P=0.023). Mortality in both groups was comparable with two patients in each group. 11 patients in the medical group (84.6%) and 9 in the mechanical group (81.8%) reached transplantation. Conclusion: This study confirmed that patients in the mechanical group were considerably worse in metabolic terms when compared to the medical group. Final outcome of bridging them to transplantation was comparable. This study seem to support the justification of reserving the mechanical circulatory support to those who are metabolically more injured without adversely affecting their outcomes.

Key Words: Mechanical circulatory support • Timing for mechanical support • Children • Metabolic injury • Biventricular assist device • Left ventricular assist device • Veno arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. D. Blume, D. C. Naftel, H. J. Bastardi, B. W. Duncan, J. K. Kirklin, S. A. Webber, and for the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study Investiga
Outcomes of Children Bridged to Heart Transplantation With Ventricular Assist Devices: A Multi-Institutional Study
Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2313 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Botha, A. Hasan, S. Haynes, J. Cassidy, J. Roe, J. Wallis, and J. Smith
Exchange Transfusion During Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Used as a Bridge to ABO-Mismatch Cardiac Transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 1105 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.