HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Wilfried Wisser Rainald Seitelberger Ernst Wolner Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wisser, W. Articles by Wolner, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wisser, W. Articles by Wolner, E. Related Collections Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:1011-1017
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL

Microwave and radiofrequency ablation yield similar success rates for treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation

^a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
^b Department of Cardiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Received 15 October 2003; received in revised form 26 January 2004; accepted 29 January 2004.

^* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43-1-40400-5620; fax: +43-1-40400-5642
e-mail: wilfried.wisser{at}akh-wien.ac.at

Objective: To evaluate the influence of two different ablation devices (microwave AFx^® and radiofrequency Medtronic^®), designed to create linear lesion lines, with respect to efficacy and restoration of sinus rhythm (SR). Methods: Between February 2001 and December 2002, 42 patients with chronic, persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) >6 months were submitted to different combinations of valve surgery (mitral±tricuspid, n=30; mitral and aortic±tricuspid reconstruction, n=6; aortic±tricuspid, n=8) and concomitant Maze procedure. The biatrial Maze followed the concept of the Cox III procedure, using either microwave energy (AFx Lynx) (group I: age 65.8±11.9 years, mean duration of AF 61.9±28.9 months, n=23) or radiofrequency (Medtronic Cardioblate) (group II: age 64.1±11.1 years, mean duration of AF 53.5±49 months, n=19). Results: There was one death with group I (4%), due to liver failure. Both groups were comparable with regard to Euro Score, ejection fraction, cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, ICU (median 1 day in both groups) and hospital stay, and type of indication. The preoperative diameter of the left atrium was 69.7±10.8 and 74.0±14.3 mm in groups I and II, respectively (P=0.359). The Maze procedure resulted in 23±2 and 17±1 min additional cross clamp time in groups I and II, respectively (P=0.013). At the 12-month follow up, freedom from AF was 81 and 80% in groups I and II, respectively. Twenty percent in group I and 21% in group II needed a pacemaker (PM), due to sick sinus syndrome (2 versus 2 cases), AV bloc (2 versus 1 case) and preoperative bradycardia (0 versus 1 case), respectively. Conclusions: The combination of complex valve surgery and Maze procedure was safe and reproducible. Following the Cox Maze III line concept, microwave and radiofrequency ablation gave similar results even in patients with more complex double or triple valve procedures.

Key Words: Chronic atrial fibrillation • Maze • Radiofrequency • Microwave

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Vicol, D. Kellerer, P. Petrakopoulou, I. Kaczmarek, P. Lamm, and B. Reichart Long-term results after ablation for long-standing atrial fibrillation concomitant to surgery for organic heart disease: Is microwave energy reliable? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1156 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fleck, F. Wolf, T. Bader, R. Lehner, C. Aigner, G. Stix, E. Wolner, and W. Wisser Atrial Function After Ablation Procedure in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Using Steady-State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1600 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Wisser, G. Seebacher, T. Fleck, C. Aigner, C. Khazen, G. Stix, D. Hutschala, and E. Wolner Permanent Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: Is Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Enough? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1151 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Gillinov, S. Bhavani, E. H. Blackstone, J. Rajeswaran, L. G. Svensson, J. L. Navia, B.G. Pettersson, J. F. Sabik III, N. G. Smedira, T. Mihaljevic, et al. Surgery for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Patient Factors and Lesion Set Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 502 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Melby, A. Zierer, S. P. Kaiser, R. B. Schuessler, and R. J. Damiano Jr Epicardial microwave ablation on the beating heart for atrial fibrillation: The dependency of lesion depth on cardiac output. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 355 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Itoh, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, H. Nakajima, S. Komori, and S. Kitamura The impact of mitral valve surgery combined with maze procedure. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1030 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Barnett and N. Ad Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1029 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Haywood Can we ablate permanent atrial fibrillation? Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 152 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Gammie, J. C. Laschinger, J. M. Brown, R. S. Poston, R. N. Pierson III, L. G. Romar, K. L. Schwartz, M. J. Santos, and B. P. Griffith A Multi-Institutional Experience With the CryoMaze Procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 876 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S Kabbani, G. Murad, H. Jamil, A. Sabbagh, and K. Hamzeh Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Microwave Energy - Early Experience Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2005; 13(3): 247 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]