EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Massimo Lemma
Andrea Mangini
Guido Gelpi
Amedeo Spina
Carlo Antona
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemma, M.
Right arrow Articles by Antona, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemma, M.
Right arrow Articles by Antona, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:110-117
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL


Is it better to use the radial artery as a composite graft? Clinical and angiographic results of aorto-coronary versus Y-graft

Massimo Lemma*, Andrea Mangini, Guido Gelpi, Andrea Innorta, Amedeo Spina, Carlo Antona

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery ‘L. Sacco Hospital’, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy

Received 19 October 2003; received in revised form 7 March 2004; accepted 15 March 2004.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-02-3904-2333; fax: +39-02-3904-2652
e-mail: massimo.lemma{at}fastwebnet.it
e-mail: m.lemma{at}hsacco.it

Objective: We sought to evaluate whether the radial artery (RA) provides the same clinical and angiographic results when proximally anastomosed to the aorta or to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) as a composite Y-graft. Methods: From February 1999 to December 2002, 512 patients underwent myocardial revascularization using the RA, the left ITA and, when required, the saphenous vein. According to the surgeons' preference the RA was proximally anastomosed to the aorta [336 patients (65.6%), Ao-Cor group] or to the left ITA as a composite Y-graft [176 patients (34.4%), Y-graft group]. There was a significant prevalence of three-vessel disease (86.8 versus 73.2%, P=0.000) and elderly age (60±9 versus 58±8 years, P=0.014) in the Y-graft group. Results: Patients in Y-graft group had longer aortic cross clamp time (P=0.001), more bypass grafts per patient (P≤0.001), more arterial bypass grafts per patient (P≤0.001) and more bypass grafts per patient with the RA (P≤0.001). There were no differences in terms of perioperative outcome. Mean follow-up time was 27.1±11.7 months in 322/333 (96.7%) patients of the Ao-Cor group and 14.9±10.2 in 165/172 (95.9%) patients of the Y-graft group. There was no difference in terms of overall survival (P=0.75), cardiac event-free survival (P=0.65), RA patency rate at postoperative angiography (P=0.59) and during follow-up (P=0.93). A preoperative coronary artery stenosis ≤70% was related with competitive flow (P=0.000) at postoperative angiography and with RA occlusion (P=0.001) at follow-up angiography. Conclusions: The RA provides the same clinical and angiographic results both as aorto-coronary and composite Y-graft with the left ITA. When the RA is used as Y-graft the procedure is more technically demanding and a greater number of distal coronary anastomoses is possible. RA grafts to targets with stenosis ≤70% appear to be at risk of failure.

Key Words: Composite arterial graft • Myocardial revascularization • Left internal thoracic artery • Radial artery • Graft patency




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S.-H. Jung, H. Song, S. J. Choo, H. G. Je, C. H. Chung, J.-W. Kang, and J. W. Lee
Comparison of radial artery patency according to proximal anastomosis site: Direct aorta to radial artery anastomosis is superior to radial artery composite grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2009; 138(1): 76 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Nasso, R. Coppola, R. Bonifazi, F. Piancone, G. Bozzetti, and G. Speziale
Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: Direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2009; 137(5): 1093 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. H. Habib
Optimal target vessel stenosis for radial artery grafting.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 463 - 463.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
A. T Gurbuz, O. Findik, H. Cui, and A. Aytac
Radial Artery Graft Use and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Outcome
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 106 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Niwaya, T. Funatsu, A. Kawamura, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura
Angiographic flow grading and graft arrangement of arterial conduits.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1023 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Lemma and C. Antona
Reply to kargar and aazami.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 567 - 567.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.