HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Aart Brutel de la Rivière Henry A. van Swieten Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pitz, C. C.M. Articles by van den Bosch, J. M.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pitz, C. C.M. Articles by van den Bosch, J. M.M. Related Collections Lung - cancer

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:202-208
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL

Review

Surgical treatment of Pancoast tumours

^a Department of Pulmonology, Sint Antonius Hospital, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
^b Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
^c Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
^d Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Received 27 September 2003; received in revised form 7 February 2004; accepted 16 February 2004.

^* Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-30-6092428; fax: +31-30-6052001
e-mail: j.vandenbosch{at}antonius.net

Due to its localisation in the apex of the lung with invasion of the lower part of the brachial plexus, first ribs, vertebrae, subclavian vessels or stellate ganglion, a superior sulcus tumour causes characteristic symptoms, like arm or shoulder pain or Horner's syndrome. If rib invasion is the only feature, lysis of the rib must be evident on the chest radiograph; otherwise the tumour cannot be defined as a Pancoast tumour. It is important to adequately stage the tumour, because staging significantly influences survival. Survival is better for T3 than T4 tumours and mediastinal lymph node involvement has been found to be a negative prognostic factor. Also Horner's syndrome and incompleteness of resection worsen survival. The management of superior sulcus tumours has evolved over the past 50 years. Before 1950 it was considered to be inoperable and uniformly fatal. Shaw and Paulson introduced combined modality treatment and for many years, this combination of radiotherapy and surgery was the treatment of choice with a mean 5-year survival of approximately 30%. Postoperative radiotherapy or brachytherapy does not improve survival in patients with complete or incomplete resection. The tumour can be resected through the classic posterior Shaw–Paulson approach or the newer anterior transcervical approach, introduced by Dartevelle. This method facilitates better exposure of the extreme apex of the lung, brachial plexus and subclavian vessels. Regarding the extent of pulmonary resection, en bloc resection of the involved ribs with a lobectomy is recommended. Recent multimodality studies, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, show promising results regarding completeness of resection, local recurrence and survival, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. However, careful patient selection and adequate perioperative management with protection of the bronchial stump or anastomosis are important to achieve reasonable rates of morbidity and mortality. As brain metastases remain one of the most common forms of relapse, further studies are needed to examine the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with complete resection. Also the addition of other chemotherapy agents or biologic agents such as angiogenesis inhibitors or tyrosine kinase inhibitors gives a new perspective in the treatment of Pancoast tumours.

Key Words: Superior sulcus tumours • Surgery • Survival

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Klepetko Surgical intervention for T4 lung cancer with infiltration of the thoracic aorta: Are we back to the archetype of surgical thinking? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 727 - 729. [Full Text] [PDF]