HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Bartolo Zingone Aniello Pappalardo Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zingone, B. Articles by Dreas, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zingone, B. Articles by Dreas, L. Related Collections Cardiac - other

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:1134-1140
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL

Logistic versus additive EuroSCORE. A comparative assessment of the two models in an independent population sample

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiology, Ospedali Riuniti di Trieste, Trieste, Italy

Received 9 July 2004; received in revised form 1 September 2004; accepted 1 September 2004.

^* Corresponding author. Vicolo degli Scaglioni, 22, 34141 Trieste, Italy, Tel.: +39 040 3994856; fax: +39 040 3994995. (E-mail: bartolo.zingone{at}aots.sanita.fvg.it).

Objective: Validation of EuroSCORE outside the boundaries of the original database has been limited to the additive model and has occasionally shown inconsistencies. Therefore we sought to validate the logistic model and assess its predictive performance compared to the additive approach. Methods: Twenty-four hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients were prospectively assigned individual expected risks of dying calculated by the logistic and the additive EuroSCORE algorithms. Discriminating ability of the two models was tested by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Calibration was assessed by the Hosmer–Lemeshow (H-T) test and further explored by additional cross-tabulations. A percent difference among the estimates was calculated and plotted across score groups. The series was then sorted by date of operation and split in halves to separately explore the potential effect of variation of performance. Results: Observed mortality (5.6%) was not significantly different from the additive (5.3%) and the logistic estimates (6.9%). Both models satisfactorily discriminated outcomes (ROC areas of 0.80 and 0.79 for the logistic and the additive model, respectively). The H-T test showed that calibration was good for the logistic model (P=0.12) but turned out being inadequate for the additive model (P<0.0001). Further cross-tabulations confirmed a good correlation among observed and predicted death rates by the logistic model across all groups. The additive model, on the other hand, revealed a propensity to over-predict in medium-risk categories and under-predict in the very high-risk cases. Direct comparison of additive vs logistic estimates showed a similar behaviour demonstrating it as an intrinsic property of the additive approach. The split-file analysis revealed a significantly improved outcome for patients treated in the second half of the series though the predictive performance of the two models was unaltered. Conclusions: Logistic EuroSCORE reliably predicted outcomes in our series despite the higher risk profile compared to the reference EuroSCORE sample and the observed variation in clinical performance during the study period. The additive model was less precise, exhibiting a predictive distortion which should be accounted for, particularly when employing it at the individual patient level.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Brown, H. V. Schaff, M. E. Sarano, Z. Li, T. M. Sundt, J. A. Dearani, C. J. Mullany, and T. A. Orszulak Is the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 566 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Andreasen, V. Nekrasas, and C. Dethlefsen Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 384 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D'Errigo, F. Seccareccia, S. Rosato, V. Manno, G. Badoni, D. Fusco, C. A. Perucci, and the Research Group of the Italian CABG Outcome Pro Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG Outcome Project Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 325 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Mestres, M. A. Castro, E. Bernabeu, M. Josa, R. Cartana, J. L. Pomar, J. M. Miro, J. Mulet, and the Hospital Clinico Endocarditis Study Group Preoperative risk stratification in infective endocarditis. Does the EuroSCORE model work? Preliminary results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Bhatti, A D Grayson, G Grotte, B M Fabri, J Au, M Jones, B Bridgewater, and on behalf of the North West Quality Improvement Pr The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: how well does it predict operative risk? Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1817 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Matsuura, H. Ogino, H. Matsuda, K. Minatoya, H. Sasaki, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Limitations of EuroSCORE for Measurement of Risk-Stratified Mortality in Aortic Arch Surgery Using Selective Cerebral Perfusion: Is Advanced Age No Longer a Risk? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2084 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Jin, G. L. Grunkemeier, and For the Providence Health System Cardiovascular St Additive vs. logistic risk models for cardiac surgery mortality Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 240 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]