|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:S4-S7
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
Review |
Cardiac Surgery Department, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
* Tel.: +32 16 344339; fax: +32 16 344616. (Email: paul.sergeant{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be).
A strength and weakness analysis is made of the current coronary surgery practice and integrated in the socio-economic and legal changes. This analysis identifies important issues for the stability of a cardio-surgical unit. Current literature studying economic survival and innovation propose a disruptive strategy as most likely towards economic survival versus an incremental strategy. A disruptive strategy is then proposed for the survival of coronary surgery; implementing this in most units will demand an unprecedented openness of mind.
Key Words: CABG Strengths Weaknesses Future Reengineering
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |